"CANADA'S HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSE IS EXPOSED! THE TRUTH IS REVEALED" By Valerie Guillaume

CANADA'S FALSE FLAG OPERATION. THE OTTAWA SHOOTING AND THE MASS HYSTERIA, PROPELLED BY THIS PROPOGANDA.

LIES, LIES AND MORE LIES.  WHY THE PUBLIC IS NOT BEING TOLD THE TRUTH.

IT IS AN EXERCISE IN PUBLIC DECEPTION, OTHERWISE KNOWN AS PROPOGANDA.

WHEN YOU ARE CONSIDERED, AMONG THE SO-CALLED, TOP TEN NATIONS OF THE WORLD, YOU MUST ALSO DO WHAT YOU CAN, TO RETAIN THAT TITLE.  HENCE, CANADA'S ROLE, IN THE LATEST PUBLIC DECEPTION, CALLED "TERRORIST ATTACK", ON ITS OWN SOIL, WHICH IS NOTHING MORE THAN A PUBLIC DISPLAY, OF THE USUSAL EVILS THAT IT ALSO CARRIES OUT, ON A REGULAR BASIS.

We are now familiar with the story, of Michael Zehaf Bibleau, the lone gunman who was killed on Wednesday, October 22, 2014 on Parliament Hill, in Ottawa, Canada, in what I believe to be nothing more than a False Flag Operation, that was also carried out by the Canadian government, in order to prepare the public, for many more of such attacks.

Canada, of course, do not want to be left behind, in these military exercises and in regards to its totalitarian and police state. It has to play its part directly and to play "catch up" with its allies, such as the U.S., Australia, Britain and other countries, who are doing the same. But it need to also spare us from its hypocritical stance, regarding the so called 'terrorist attack' on its own soil, as if we do not have the intelligence ourselves, to figure it all out.

All such False Flag operations has its victims and both Cpl. Nathan Cirillo and also Michael Zehaf-Bibleau, the gunman in this case, are the victims in this mastermind, of the Canadian government. Cirillo was the Canadian soldier that was killed, while guarding the memorial of the dead. And now he has also joined them. Zehaf-Bibleau on the other hand, is the shooter and the alleged "terrorist", who was induced, either by drugs, or by mind control, to carry out certain acts of terror, which in fact are also carefully orchestrated, to deceived the public.  And then kill him afterwards to either shut him up and to hide the evidence (as with the Timothy McVeigh scenario), or to show that the Canadian government, is "on top of the game".  That is, that, the so- called terrorists won't win. 

The real truth is that the only 'real' terrorists that exist, are the ones who are running our governments and who also carry out untold acts of terror, daily, on innocent civilians. So spare us this melodrama
and with it also the spurious words, of the Prime Minister Steven Harper, which also has not one drop of sincerity.

And since we are speaking of terrorist acts, let us not forget about an organization that exist presently called ISIS, that is all about terrorism. You see, ISIS, is a creation of the U.S. government's CIA and it is also nothing more than the 'extended' arms of that country, as well as some others, including Israel, Britain and also Canada and other allied nations, in the Middle East.  It exist to carry out the agenda of those nations. How does this all ties in with the present Ottawa shooting?  Because I also believe that part of the agenda of the globalists, including the Canadian Prime Minister, Steven Harper, is also a separation of Canada.  They mean to separate Quebec from the rest of Canada. Harper has no more allegiance to Canada, than Barak Obama, as president has to the United States of America.  It is all about a one world government, which they are all a part of.

And False Flag Operations, like the one we have also just witnessed, in regards to the Ottawa shooting, is also part of their agenda. Victims are pre-selected and those that are considered expendable, are the one who ended up being publicly 'euthanized'. Actually, sacrificed would be a better word to use here, on behalf of the victims. Terrorists, are the ones who are actually carrying out 'terrorist activities'. I can't think of any more terrorist activities, than what the Canadian government, is also carrying out, QUIETLY, against its own citizens.

 NOTE:  Until the United Nations takes the complaints that are coming from victims of horrific human rights abuse such as torture in Canada, that are being carried out quietly, against citizens and against their will, then the belief also that Canada, does not carry out Crimes Against Humanity, is a farce.  To take away someone's dignity as a human being and to subject them to inhumane treatment, and then to pretend that you also uphold human rights, is a betrayal that must not be ignored by international organizations. To me, those are terrorist acts by the government.

Assault in Canada's answer to war in Iraq, Global Research by Contrainjerencia:

                                                                                                                            Operation Snatch Niggers cont'd                                                 10/23/14 • Posted in USA AND CANADA • Visits 236, 236 issue in this day • Print This Article Print this Article
The recent attack on the Canadian Parliament is a legislative response to the endorsement of the country's participation in the war against the Islamic State (EI) in Iraq, said today the digital Global Research site.
Many fear that the authorities make manipulation of facts like this happened in the morning yesterday, increase Islamophobia and racial discrimination of repressive bodies of this country, the article adds.
In the attack one soldier was killed and one of the alleged assailants near the main seat of Parliament, after the House of Commons vouch for the deployment of military aircraft and special forces to combat missions in Iraq.
The measure passed despite the narrow majority that has the Conservative government of Prime Minister Stephen Harper in Parliament, adds comment Global Research.
After the Royal Canadian Mounted Police report on the shooting, it was unclear whether other suspects are still at large.
But the real intention of the police was not exactly enlightening to data but to repeat to Canadians should be "vigilant and report any suspicious activity"
This attack took place in Ottawa two days after a man ran over two soldiers with his car and killed one of them in the city of Saint-Jean-sur-Richelieu, Quebec Province, about 40 kilometers from Montreal.
The suspect, identified as Martin Rouleau Couture, 25, was shot dead by special units of the order.
The official campaign on the issue said the man "wanted to become a terrorist," while the Ottawa Sun newspaper noted that "her family and the authorities are trying to figure out why he followed orders to assassinate EI" says Global Research. 

Canada is a country of heinous crimes of grief and mourning, a land of human misery without any hope. An ocean of human tragedy, that their fierce waves drag millions of shattered lives.                    Nadir Siguencia                                                                                           

Toronto Sun: Canada raised its domestic terrorism threat level from low to medium!

No honest journalist should be willing to describe himself or herself as 'embedded.' To say, 'I'm an embedded journalist' is to say, 'I'm a government Propagandist.”
- Noam Chomsky

                         Canadian children succumb to child welfare industrial complex in Calgary Press TV News                                                           Toronto Sun: The real threat of domestic terrorism; that we are living inside of this country is in the level high; countless dangerous criminals are loose, walking free in the streets of this nation. Professional’s delinquents called "Powerful as God" are protected by the government and the authorities, to commit heinous crimes. "Children's Aid Societies” Toronto Sun Wednesday
October 22
2014                 News Canada

Canada raised terrorism threat level days before attack on soldiers
QMI Agency                                                                    First posted: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 07:36 AM EDT | Updated: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 07:47 AM EDT                 Canada raised its domestic terrorism threat level from low to medium late last week, but there was no specific threat that triggered the change, a government spokesman says.                                                           “The decision to raise the level is linked to an increase in general chatter from radical Islamist organizations like ISIL (Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant), al-Qaida, al-Shabab and others who pose a clear threat to Canadians,” Jason Tamming, a spokesman for Public Safety Minister Stephen Blaney, told Sun News Network.                                                                                                                                                          "This level means that intelligence has indicated that an individual or group within Canada or abroad has the intent and capability to commit an act of terrorism, and that the Integrated Terrorism Assessment Centre assesses that a violent act of terrorism could occur."                                                                                    The terror threat level was changed on Friday, just days before a radicalized Quebec man ran down two soldiers, killing one of them, outside an armed forces recruitment office in Saint-Jean-Sur-Richelieu, Que. The suspect, 25-year-old Martin Couture-Rouleau, was shot and killed by police.                                     Global News, which broke the story, said this is the first time the terror threat level has been raised since Aug. 13, 2010.

JOURNALISTS FROM THE TORONTO SUN: CAN WE CALL THE CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETIES HOLOCAUST; DOMESTIC TERRORISM?

"The regime and the Supreme Court of Canada, they are interested in saving money and getting rid of patients with disabilities, denying the right to life"

Life is really simple, but we insist on making it complicated.  .- Confucius                                            Mr. Corbeil says: I am free - I'm free...

 
Life is really simple, but we insist on making it complicated.  .- Confucius                     Judges from Supreme Court of Canada before to approve any regulation with respect the right to die, should take in consideration the case of Mr. Robert Corbeil, and thousands of other cases. Mr Corbeil he is expressing the necessity to have proper medical and family care. Also, is grateful to know that he is counting with his own equipment necessary to live. The Regime and the Supreme Court of Canada, they are interested to save money and getting rid of patients with disabilities, denying the right to life.                                                                                                                                                          

He was given the right to die a gentle death 22 years ago. He didn’t take it. But he’s glad he was given the choice

Republish Reprint

Graeme Hamilton | October 17, 2014 | Last Updated: Oct 17 6:00 PM ET
More from Graeme Hamilton | @grayhamilton

Christinne Muschi for National PostRobert Corbeil — left paralyzed after an accident in 1992 — looks outside at his home in Sainte-Adele, Quebec, October 17, 2014.                                         SAINTE-ADÈLE, Que. – Completely paralyzed from the neck down following an accident at age 33, confined to a wheelchair in a long-term care centre, Robert Corbeil saw no point in living. So in 1991, a year after his accident, he asked a court to be allowed to starve to death.              “I don’t see myself stuck like this in a wheelchair for another 35 years, not at my age,” he testified when Superior Court Justice Gontran Rouleau visited his bedside. Mr. Corbeil said he was seeking a gentle death, “to stop this nonsense, stop tearing myself apart and fighting without having any future, any hope.”                                                                                                                    The January 1992 decision granting Mr. Corbeil’s request not to be force-fed was a landmark in Canadian law. Mr. Corbeil had the right to refuse treatment and “die with dignity,” Judge Rouleau ruled. Université de Montréal ethicist David Roy wrote at the time that the court had recognized that even in cases when a patient is not terminally ill, “prolonging life at any cost, particularly at the cost of unbearable suffering for the patient, proves to be an attitude that is more than deplorable.”                                                                                                                        Twenty-two years later, the debate over death with dignity continues to rage in Canada, and Mr. Corbeil, 58, is watching it with interest.                                                                                                   Related

• Jonathan Kay: Why my generation will be the one to enshrine the right to assisted suicide
• John Moore: Don’t tell me how to die
• Assisted suicide case begins at Supreme Court of Canada: ‘No one wants to die if living is better’                                                                                                                                       After his court victory, he decided not to go through with his fast immediately. And then, slowly, things started getting better. A specially equipped van bought by his family meant he could regularly get out of the long-term care centre, known in Quebec as a CHSLD, and take in a movie or go to a restaurant. He fell in love with a woman who came to visit her ailing mother at the centre, and today they live together in a house custom-built by his brother and two sons.                                                                                                                     “It makes us see that we can live, that we can still have an acceptable quality of life when we are not imprisoned in a CHSLD,” he said in an interview this week.

In Ottawa, the Supreme Court of Canada heard arguments Wednesday in a case seeking to overturn the prohibition against assisting a patient’s suicide. In Quebec, the provincial government this year became the first jurisdiction in North America to legalize euthanasia, clearing the way for physicians to end the life of a dying patient by lethal injection. But while some might be tempted to see Mr. Corbeil, 58, as a living, breathing argument against assisted death, he remains thankful that he was given the option to die by the court in 1992. He sees the current debate as one over whether suffering people should have a choice.                                            “If you’re talking about rights that are being sought, I am in total agreement, because they allow us to choose,” he said.                                                                                                                                “If they will offer the help to have an acceptable life, I will choose to live. If I don’t have any help and I’m going to be in a prison, I prefer to die.”                                                                                On May 23, 1990, Mr. Corbeil was married and employed as a carpenter when he took his two boys out for a spin on an all-terrain vehicle he was thinking of buying. He hit a hole, the ATV                   tipped and as he tried to protect hi sons, the vehicle landed on him.

                                                                                                      Christinne Muschi for National PostRobert Corbeil — left paralyzed after an accident in 1992 — outside his home with his partner Martine Alles in Sainte-Adele, Quebec, October 17, 2014.        After nearly a year in a rehabilitation facility, he returned home, but his family was ill equipped to care for him. He was moved into a CHSLD, but when neurological results in September 1991 confirmed that there was no hope for improvement, he informed his family that he wanted to die.             His wife, his mother, his doctor, a counselor, a social worker and a chaplain all tried to dissuade him, the court heard, but his mind was made up. “I am stuck with total quadriplegia that leaves me unable to move from my shoulders to my toes,” he testified. “After the doctors informed me there is no possibility of a physical recovery, I said, ‘That’s enough. I can’t continue. It’s too hard.’ ” In a sworn affidavit, he asked that he not be fed or given any medical treatment to prolong his life. He requested appropriate medication to ease his suffering, “so as to reserve for me a gentle death.”                                                                                                                               Judge Rouleau concluded that feeding was a form of medical treatment, and Mr. Corbeil was within his rights to refuse it. “In principle, every person has the right to enjoy life, and as a corollary, he also has the right to die with dignity and according to his choice,” the judge wrote.     Asked today why he did not follow through with his life-ending fast, Mr. Corbeil said it was no single revelation but a gradual re-discovery of what life could offer. Family, in particular his mother, visited more frequently and took him on excursions beyond the walls of the CHSLD. His marriage ended in divorce, but he remains grateful to his ex-wife for raising his two sons. “They are very well brought-up, and I am proud,” he said.

Christinne Muschi for National PostRobert Corbeil at home in Sainte-Adele, Quebec, October 17, 2014.                                                                                                                                    Technological advances have granted him a degree of independence. He operates his computer via a tiny mirror on his glasses that directs the cursor as he moves his head. A straw allows him to click the cursor by breathing. He commands his wheelchair with a cephalic joystick, which uses his head movements to guide the chair. He can turn on the TV when he pleases and open the door using a baton held in his mouth to push a button on his wheelchair.                                              But he would not have been able to move into his own home 10 years ago had he not met Martine Allès during her frequent visits to her mother, who was on the same floor of the CHSLD as Mr. Corbeil. She said she never imagined herself in the dual role of spouse and vital caregiver for someone with a serious disability. “The heart is stronger than us,” she said.

Dr. Roy, the ethicist who commented on Mr. Corbeil’s 1992 court victory, is now director of a research lab on ethics and aging at the Institut universitaire de gériatrie de Montréal and editor in chief of the Journal of Palliative Care.                                                                                                      He opposes Quebec’s euthanasia law, due to take effect by the end of next year, fearing it will lead to abuses. While there are times when it is “ethically tolerable” for a physician to end a patient’s life, he said, it will come to be seen as a normal practice once it is enshrined in law.        Still, he does not think Mr. Corbeil’s case should be held up as an argument against assisted death. “It’s a remarkable story. It really is,” he said.

Christinne Muschi for National PostRobert Corbeil at home, in Sainte-Adele, Quebec, October 17, 2014.                                                                                                                                            “But we can’t generalize it. Some people would like to say, ‘See! Corbeil! That can happen to anybody.’ I’m sorry. It cannot happen to anybody …. Human beings are all so infinitely different, and that’s why we cannot have one law, either approving of euthanasia or prohibiting euthanasia that can apply without exception to anybody.                                                                           “I think it’s better to keep the law against homicide, against administering death, but being wise enough when cases come up not to prosecute or not to convict.”                                                           Mr. Corbeil believes society needs to do a better job helping the suffering so, whenever possible, they choose life. Last summer, 42-year-old Pierre Mayence, a Quebec man living in a CHSLD after a 2010 skydiving accident left him quadriplegic, invoked Mr. Corbeil’s case as a precedent to seek the right not to be force-fed. He was successful and died of starvation in September after a two-month fast, La Presse reported. Mr. Corbeil wonders whether Mr. Mayence “could have seen it’s possible to continue with help.”                                                                                                   He said facilities providing long-term care need be more humane. “For those who see no end or cure, who suffer and who decide to die, it is their choice. If it is their own choice, I agree,” he said. “But even more, I support the government acting on its promises, providing support for people to remain home with necessary help. It will cost society much less than putting them in a CHSLD.”                                                                                                                                                    For Mr. Corbeil, escaping the CHSLD has opened a world he thought was forever closed. After his accident, he had given away all his carpentry tools, but now saws, hammers and screwdrivers hang neatly in his garage. If a repair is needed, he is able to instruct someone exactly how to do it. When he moved into his house, he taught Ms. Allès’ teenage son how to plant the cedar hedge that thrives today. He has also become an advocate for patients in the Laurentians region. As Ms. Allès joked, his tongue still works fine.                                                                                                 There are still plenty of frustrations. The wages paid the home caregivers sent by the local health centre are low, and they tend not to last long before they find something that pays better. A repairman just advised him that his electric bed, which allows caregivers to raise and lower him, will soon need to be replaced at a cost of $3,000.                                                                                      But his life today is incomparably better than it was in the dark days after his accident. As he said goodbye to a reporter Friday morning, he discussed his plans for the rest of the day. “We’re going to talk a bit, then we’ll go to Saint-Jérôme to buy some groceries. After that, who knows? I’m free. Maybe we’ll visit some family,” he said. “I’m free.”