Wednesday, February 25, 2015

'CANADA INCITES GENOCIDIO OF ABORIGINES''

                                                                                                                                                                  Canada incites genocide of aborigines The United Nations has censured the Canadian government for its gross violations of the rights of children and has accused the country of "serious and widespread discrimination" against First Nations children.
On Monday, the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child (CRC) issued its formal report on Canada's treatment of children and the country's commitment to the world body's Convention on the Rights of the Child, Canada's.
The CRC accused Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper's government of violating the convention by introducing Bill C-10 to the country's Youth Criminal Justice Act earlier this year.
Bill C-10, which the CRC says does not comply with international standards, allows for harsher penalties for youth offenders and makes it easier for courts to judge them as adults.
The report also expressed concern over the Canadian government's discrimination against its indigenous and black children, who are more likely to be incarcerated than other children.
Many political analysts say that under Stephen Harper's government, human rights abuses in Canada have increased dramatically.
Press TV has conducted an interview with Alfred Lambremont, a human rights lawyer from Vancouver, to further discuss the issue.

Monday, February 23, 2015

“PUBLIC ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS OF CANADA AND HER PLAN OF STUDIES OF SEXUAL EDUCATION FOR STUDENTS OF FIRST GRADE"





                                                                               
No, it’s not dirty talk — just straight talk on sex, sexting, body parts, consent, mental health, and other life (or life-saving) skills for kids.                                                                                                                                                            When Canadian public elementary students are considerate systematically at the bottom in the world on standardized tests.”  The Premier Minister of Ontario revealed: the updating in sexual education in elementary schools students in Ontario that both need: for recognizing students in public elementary schools at the Top of the World! Mrs. Kathleen Wynne instead to bring sex education to the classrooms in a premature edge, by involving six years old students, the duty of the Premier of Ontario is to reform the curriculum of public elementary education schools in Ontario, from grade 1 to 8 with a quality instruction in the general subjects. The question is Mrs. Premier of Ontario: elementary students of public schools from grade 1 to 6 in the need to learn to read and write correctly; are ready to understand and respond to your implemented and updated sexual education? Besides elementary school students not only are struggling with reading  and writing skills also are experiencing a very serious difficulties with other subjects as  mathematics, geography, history…  and your first concern is to bring to the classrooms your exigent plan of sexuality to innocent six years old children! The provincial parliament plan of evil malice against small school children have to be reviewed by the province of Ontario parents. Also it’s the appropriate moment to ask the Premier of Ontario for a full investigation about the mental, physical, and sexual abuse of school children in Ontario for part of the Board of Education Staff.

Revealed: The sex-ed update Ontario badly needs:  Cohn

                         
No, it’s not dirty talk — just straight talk on sex, sexting, body parts, consent, mental health, and other life (or life-saving) skills for kids.

  • Reddit this!
Premier Kathleen Wynne is finally implementing an updated sex-ed curriculum for Ontario schools. She oversaw the reforms as education minister in 2010, but they were shelved by then-premier Dalton McGuinty for political reasons.
Andrew Francis Wallace / Toronto Star Order this photo
Premier Kathleen Wynne is finally implementing an updated sex-ed curriculum for Ontario schools. She oversaw the reforms as education minister in 2010, but they were shelved by then-premier Dalton McGuinty for political reasons.
By: Martin Regg Cohn Provincial Politics, Published on Sat Feb 21 2015
A new sex-education curriculum, to be revealed Monday, will be the talk — and the teaching — in our schools starting this September.
It’s about time. Five years after capitulating to a contrived outcry from political and social conservatives, the Liberal government is finally modernizing our embarrassingly outdated sex-ed curriculum.
This time, sources say, there will be no backing down from the badly needed update.
Two separate documents obtained by the Star — a revamped 240-page Health and Physical Education curriculum for Grades 1 to 8, and a new 218-page volume for Grades 9 to 12 — will roll out sex-ed material that isn’t so much explicit as explanatory.
No, it’s not dirty talk — just straight talk on sex, sexting, body parts, consent, mental health, and other life (or life-saving) skills for girls and boys. The idea is for teachers to inoculate students against the ways of the world before they surf the world wild web on their own.
Our children deserve to learn it all in classrooms, not be lured in lurid chat rooms.
Yes, children will be taught at an early age that there is something called a penis. Also a vagina. Get used to it — Grade 1 kids already are, and child-abuse investigators have long been calling for it.
In Grade 6, the words “vaginal lubrication” will be up for discussion. Yes, there is talk of “wet dreams.” And if kids ask about masturbation in class, yes, the optional “teacher prompt” advises that it “is not harmful and is one way of learning about your body.”
(Nothing in the preceding paragraph is part of the official curriculum or obligatory for teachers. The material is included as optional guidelines, recognizing that many kids are taught sex-ed by phys-ed teachers who are juggling other roles and appreciate the professional support.)
Older students will hear the words “oral sex” — hopefully (and then thankfully) before they ever experience it, so they can learn why sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are rising. For similar reasons, anal sex is discussed in later grades — no, not encouraged, but questions answered.
  THE GOVERNMENT ABUSED ABORIGINAL CHILDREN!!!                                                                                  
Here’s a shocker for people who assume the worst about sex-ed: Grade 7 students will be taught about “delaying sexual activity,” notably “choosing to abstain from any genital contact; choosing to abstain from having vaginal or anal intercourse; choosing to abstain from having oral-genital contact … the reasons for not engaging in sexual activity; the concept of consent and how consent is communicated.”
Here’s a prompt for Grade 7 teachers dealing with 12- and 13-year-olds if the issue arises in the classroom: “Engaging in sexual activities like oral sex, vaginal intercourse, and anal intercourse means that you can be infected with an STI.”
Is all that best left unsaid, in hopes of leaving well enough alone? Only if parents are prepared to live with the consequences — confusing their personal religious faith with blind faith in teenage behaviour.
While opponents fulminate about the mere mention of body parts, body language plays an expanded role in the curriculum, as students learn to read signals while vocalizing their feelings. There is new material for students about the ins and outs of sexual consent — the importance of standing up for yourself instead of going to bed with someone. That means teaching kids to assert themselves rather than remain silent, and to respect one another.
For all the looming hysteria, hypocrisy and hyperbole from hypersensitive critics, the updated curriculum isn’t all about sex or sexuality.
It includes badly needed material on the plague of cyberbullying that we’ve seen destroy the lives of vulnerable kids as traditional toilet-stall vulgarisms go viral online.
In a prompt for Grade 5 students, here’s a suggested response for teachers: “Sharing private sexual photos or posting sexual comments online is unacceptable and also illegal.”
Teaching materials on mental health, previously relegated to older grades, will now be introduced in Grade 9, because the experts thought it more in line with the times.
There is more information on drug abuse that would be irrelevant to younger kids, and more detail about sexual orientation.
The background to this back-to-school curriculum is the research from hundreds of experts in sexual health and pedagogy — no, pedophiliacs weren’t involved — that even as pregnancy rates are declining, STIs are on the increase.
Turns out we are better at preventing babies than protecting kids, who suffer from more disease than before because we’ve stuck to the status quo. Our existing curriculum is circa 1998, while other provinces have kept up with the sex-ed times to the point that many Ontario teachers now rely on conservative Alberta’s curriculum as a resource.
Premier Kathleen Wynne is determined to go where Dalton McGuinty didn’t dare. When critics pounced, he renounced — shelving Wynne’s work as the education minister who oversaw the 2010 reforms. Fearful of a pre-election fight ahead of the 2011 campaign, her predecessor as premier buckled under pressure — and failed this simple classroom test:
Stick to the facts. Stand by the research.
Nearly two decades after Ontario’s last curriculum update — long before broadband reached every home, smartphones invaded every teenager’s pocket, and cyberbullies pushed aside schoolyard bullies — Ontario is belatedly recognizing the Internet age. And the age of puberty.
A parent guide to the curriculum, to be released online Monday, notes that girls “usually enter puberty sometime between 8 and 13 years of age,” while for boys it ranges from 9 to 14. That’s why the updated curriculum now introduces some of those more puberty-related topics in Grade 4, rather than Grade 5.
The political and pedagogical stakes are high. Wynne is putting her personal credibility on the line as the government braces for the inevitable backlash from an unholy alliance of social and political conservatives — right wing opposition opportunists and fundamentalists who are trying to distort science to fit their distorted views of religion.
It’s about biology, not ideology.
But there is a Progressive Conservative leadership race underway in which all three remaining candidates have discredited and even disgraced themselves by pandering to parents using code language and deceptive rhetoric.
Opponents claim they don’t oppose sex education, just that parents should teach it at home — which sounds suspiciously like a home-schooling recipe for unravelling any class-based curriculum. And assumes that kids would cheerfully absorb parental lectures on the perils of oral sex (or that teenagers heed their parents about anything).
Some of the more opportunistic politicians from the Official Opposition say they support sex-ed, they just want more parental involvement — or as leadership candidate Monte McNaughton argues, while boasting of his credentials as the father of an 18-month-old — parents should “be at the table.”
Apparently it’s not enough that the government consulted hundreds of experts, educators, and religious bodies, reached out to parents from the more than 4,000 elementary schools across Ontario, have massive support from teachers and their unions in all school boards, and that public opinion polls show more than 9 in 10 parents are broadly supportive.
It’s worth noting that the influential Institute for Catholic Education — an umbrella group comprising the Assembly of Catholic Bishops, Catholic trustees, principals, teachers and parents — has been consulted throughout the development of the updated curriculum. It’s also worth noting that the institute describes itself as “animated by the Gospel and reflecting the tenets of the Catholic faith.”
Hard to argue with that fidelity to research and religious faith.
But many still will, loudly and politically. The curriculum’s opponents should do their homework, lest they fall behind their own kids.
Martin Regg Cohn’s Ontario politics column appears Tuesday, Thursday and Sunday. mcohn@thestar.ca , Twitter: @reggcohn

Friday, February 20, 2015

"Face to Face with Joshua Blakeney: The Origins of The War On Terror"

Joshua Blakeney is a Calgary-based freelance journalist and activist. Blakeney's research became national news after being awarded the Queen Elizabeth II Graduate Scholarship to study the Origins of the Global War on Terror.
Joshua Blakeney is quite an impressive young man. In this exclusive interview, he deftly, fluidly and eloquently speaks about Israel's 'unprecedented control over American politics,' and how 9/11 -- via Zionist proxies -- facilitated the War on Terrorism. With his extensive background in the studies of terrorism and his thesis -- in which he references a twenty-five year old book by Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu -- he hypothesizes that Israel is exporting or "globalizing" Israeli and Zionist philosophy and policy or "Globalizing Terrorism and Zionist propaganda."

Tuesday, February 17, 2015

"CABELLO DENOUNCED THAT A CANADIAN OFFICIAL INVESTIGATED THE CAPACITIES OF CONTINGENCY FROM THE AIRPORT OF VALENCIA"



CANADIAN REGIME: "PART OF A COMPLOT TO DESTROY A DEMOCRATIC GOVERNMENT; WHO IS CONCERNED IN THE PROTECTION AND ASSISTANCE OF MARGINALIZED PEOPLE"
                                                                                                                                                               Diosdado Cabello
Credit: Archive
15-02-15.-President of the National Assembly, Diosdado Cabello, reported Friday that an official from the Canadian Embassy in Venezuela, was inquiring about the capabilities of Arturo Michelena Airport Valencia for special cases ..
During a special program broadcast on VTV to introduce new evidence of the dismantled 'Blow Blue', planned by the right, Hair revealed that Canadian official identified as Nancy Birbek conducted research on airport facilities carabobeña capital.
"On Monday along with another officer of the Canadian Embassy, this lady identified as Nancy Birbeck, was inquiring about the capabilities thereof (airport) for special cases. Did this lady is asking about the capabilities of the airport for contingency cases? "Asked the senator.
In that sense, Hair linked this with the coup plans that were neutralized by the security forces and officials FANB, who unveiled the actions to be carried out against the people and the Bolivarian government.
Cabello added that not only foreign official was performing functions that do not belong, but also another official embassy in the UK, is also working on suspicious situations. "But so have you identified and we know their movements," he said.
In the same issue of foreign interference in the country's affairs, Cabello said an official of the US Embassy, in charge of visas, who are performing work outside their functions in the country. "And we know who he is. And let him. After not come with that which is official, "he said.
He added that the actions being implemented in the country's foreign intelligence bodies are part of the manuals unconventional warfare the US government. "Be assured you are trying to provoke violence but justice will act. Justice must he act for the good of this country, "he concluded.
http://www.aporrea.org/oposicion/n265329.html CANADIAN REGIME: "PART OF A COMPLOT TO DESTROY A DEMOCRATIC GOVERNMENT; WHO IS CONCERNED IN THE PROTECTION AND ASSISTANCE OF MARGINALIZED PEOPLE"

Sunday, February 15, 2015

The 'hazy' border between terrorists and criminals


                                                                                                                                                                  Canadian PressCanadian Press
Canadian Press
Laura Kane4 hrs ago

When authorities revealed the stunning news of an alleged plot to attack a Halifax shopping mall both police and federal Justice Minister Peter MacKay stressed it wasn't a terrorist plot.MacKay told reporters at a news conference on Saturday that the alleged plan appeared to be product of a "group of murderous misfits" prepared to "wreak havoc and mayhem on our community."Police said there is no evidence that ideology or culture is part of the allegations. But if plotting to cause mass murder in a public place is not called terrorism, then what is?                                           Defining terrorism is a complex task, one that has preoccupied governments since the Sept. 11 attacks on New York and Washington,                      experts say. And with Prime Minister Stephen Harper's new anti-terror bill before Parliament, taking a closer look at the Canadian definition is all the more crucial.                            "The problem of defining terrorism has been a thorny one from the get-go," said terrorism expert John Thompson, vice president of Strategic Capital and Intelligence Group.                                 "Terrorism overlaps with so many other activities. When does a violent protest become terrorism? When does some sort of psychotic episode where someone is acting out become terrorism? It's a very hazy border."                   In Canada, section 83.01 of the Criminal Code defines terrorism as an act committed "in whole or in part for a political, religious or ideological purpose, objective or cause" with the intention of intimidating the public's security or compelling a person, government or organization to do or refrain from doing an act. Thompson said this definition was intentionally general and open to interpretation, but the key element is a political or ideological motivation.                                                                        "Terrorists can attack literally anything and they have, but the motivation has to be more political than anything else. Terrorism has always got an ideology involved in it," he said.                                                                                   Two suspects have been charged with conspiracy to commit murder. Had they been accused of terrorism, the range of offences and potential punishment would have been much greater, said Thompson.                                                       "Some of our terrorism legislation is high-powered and we don't want it to be used for every single case," he said.    Andrew Mack, a security expert and professor in the school for international studies at Simon Fraser University, called the alleged Halifax plot a "deadly criminal offence," but not a terrorist one.                                                                                                                                                                                       "The important point there is political intent, and 'political' is fairly widely interpreted," he said. "If we're talking about (ISIL), for example, they will always justify what they're doing in religious terms. But as far as law enforcement is concerned, that's political."                                                                                                      There has been considerable debate over whether terrorism should be defined separately from other acts of mass violence, said Christian Leuprecht, a security expert with Queens University and the Royal Military College of Canada.                                                                                "This is an issue that was raised after 9-11 and this is an issue that continues to preoccupy us," he said. "Is there a point in actually having terrorism as an offence at all?"                                                                 However, Leuprecht said he believes the legal distinction is important.                                                                                     He said Canada's anti-terror legislation affords police more powers in preventing planned attacks, but investigations tend to be longer and more laborious. The government also must be able to identify and define terrorist organizations, he said.                                                                         "If we simply rely on Criminal Code provisions then we can't lay out those clear distinctions," he said.                              Leuprecht added there are "mountains of case law" for prosecutors to rely on when it comes to seeking a conviction for conspiracy to commit murder. But terrorism-related offences are a relatively new area of law and only a small number of people have been convicted.                                     He said the target of the attack is important, pointing out a plot to attack the Nova Scotia legislature would have likely been considered terrorist.                                                                                            "These are distinct threats to the broader national security of Canada," he said. "Plotting to commit an attack on a mall in Halifax, while atrocious, is not an inherent risk to the security of Canada."                             The suspects charged in connection with the Halifax case, Lindsay Kantha Souvannarath, 23, and Randall Steven Shepherd, 20, are to appear in court on Tuesday to face the allegations against them.                                   A third suspect, a 19-year-old teen, was found dead by police in a Halifax area home while a fourth person, a 17-year-old, was arrested but later released without being charged.

 

Saturday, February 14, 2015

"Fear and torture in Syria's hospitals"

"Toronto Sick Children's, Sunnybrook and St. Joseph hospitals" are the same hells of Abu-Ghraib and Guantanamo! 100% of evidence.

“Also Fear and Torture in Canadian Hospitals”                                                                                                       Hospitals of this city should be investigated by an international human rights organization, not only by the infringement on personal medical records, also by the eminent danger which doctors represent for the patients. Health centers: as St Joseph, and Sunnybrook hospitals, has been used by the police in cooperation with medical staff as places of physical and mental torture.

 "Father testified at child case of seeing the horror of the physical and psychological deterioration of his son in the Sick Children's Hospital of Toronto"                                                                                                           Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto is one of the health centers, where so-called medical equipment together with medical students are using children as guinea pigs for experiments. The work of psychologists is to manipulate, control, and dominate the minds of infants until they exhibit total submission, prerequisite for these criminals to benefit financially. After causing severe damage in deteriorating the mental and physical health of children, their industrial business is continuing to hospitalize ...
                                                                                                                    Rob Ford                    

                                            
                                                                                                                     February 12, 2015 7:45 am                                                                                                                       Updated: February 12, 2015 11:19 am
Three hospitals have breached Rob Ford’s medical records: report
DavidShum-headshotBy David Shum Web Producer  Global News
229121  more
Toronto Mayor Rob Ford speaks to supporters in Toronto on Monday, October 27, 2014.
Toronto Mayor Rob Ford speaks to supporters in Toronto on Monday, October 27, 2014.
THE CANADIAN PRESS/Darren Calabrese
TORONTO – A report in the Toronto Star says former mayor Rob Ford’s medical records have been breached four times in at least three Toronto hospitals since he was diagnosed with cancer last September.                                                                          The newspaper indicates Ford’s health information was first accessed at Humber River Regional Hospital in September, following by Mt. Sinai Hospital and then by staff at the University Health Network (UHN).        The Star confirms Ford’s medical file was breached by staff at the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre just last week.                    A recent Star investigation found many health-related breaches go unreported to the privacy office highlighting the need to upgrade Ontario’s health privacy laws.                                                                              Ford was diagnosed with a rare form of abdominal cancer in mid-September and dropped his bid for mayoral re-election shortly afterwards.                                                                                                                   Instead, he ran for a seat on city council and was voted in during the Oct. 27 municipal election.

!


                                                                         Canadian Al Qaeda’s: Network of Terror?
   Apply Today
"Sunnybrook and St. Joseph hospitals" are the same hells of Abu-Ghraib and Guantanamo!                                                                                                              Crimes are being perpetrated in the Sunnybrook and St. Joseph hospitals by doctors and the health care workers, these actions of horrors has created a debacle in regard to human rights violations. The metro Toronto police with the help of physicians and others health hospital workers have been using these infernos of abuse and torture to subject to the patients and social activists to the unimaginable and indescribable acts of brutality and torture committed in this nation. Overwhelming evidence confirm that the lives of the patients in the Sunnybrook and St Joseph hospitals are in constant risk, because the doctors are not following their Hippocratic Oath swear to uphold the specific ethical standards. These illegal methods of torture which are inflicted intentionally in patients to cause severe physical pain and mental suffering can be compared with the horrifying tortures carry out at the infamous prisons of Abu-Ghraib and Guantanamo. If you do not give credit on the abuse, torture, and the intention of murdering a patient/s in the Sunnybrook or St Joseph hospitals! Please feel free to contact the archives department of the mentioned hospitals, or Dr. Hans Kreder can provide with truthful information.