Monday, December 31, 2018

2018 - The Year of Lying Dangerously

BY David Macilwain:
Amongst the many things that may be said about 2018 in the echo-chambers of Western media, you can be sure that an admission of the lies that were told will not be one of them. Yet of all the things that characterize this year of fracture and dissonance, the litany of lies told by Western leaders and media stands out – a veritable juggernaut of mendacity about almost every aspect of the political and strategic battles fought against internal and external enemies over the last year.

These lies, from casual half-truths to carefully constructed false narratives, have been mostly told to and used against Western states’ own populations, to create popular support or submission to policies and actions chosen by those wielding power. But they have also been told extensively to deceive and manipulate foreign antagonists in current conflict zones – Palestine, Yemen, Syria, Ukraine, Iraq, Afghanistan.

Most disturbingly perhaps, lies have also been told to militaries and security forces by their own government leaders and intelligence agencies, and to a degree that is only now becoming apparent. The possibility that the most recent revelations on disinformation networks in Europe and the US could crack open the West’s “bodyguard of lies” makes 2018 what we might call the “Year of Lying Dangerously”.

Perhaps it’s a little personal tunnel vision that makes me focus on two of the most notable “lies” of 2018 – the Salisbury poisoning and the “Chemical attack” on Douma in Syria. But in one way or another, both of these –intimately connected – events have been central to so much else that has happened this year.

Whether it’s the “Iranian connection” – between the Iranian nuclear deal, Iran’s support for Syria against foreign-backed terrorists, joint Saudi-US-Israeli propaganda warfare over Yemen and Hezbollah – or the “Russian connection” – conflict over oil and gas markets, pipelines to Turkey and Germany, political and military support for Syria, information warfare with the US over Trump and the UK over “Novichok” – or simply the Tweets of Trump, - the Chemical Weapon disinformation war has been central to 2018.

Vanessa Beeley Exposes the White Helmets

It’s hard for those of us not seduced by the West’s Orwellian news machine to understand just how pervasively effective its mind-bending disinformation operations have become. The individuals and organizations leading these campaigns have evidently also been seduced by their own power to mislead millions, effected with a few mouse clicks or a single video clip.

And in their absolute disdain for their audience, they may be caught out pushing too far. Such was the case with the memorable “Mannequin Challenge” performed live on set by a couple of White Helmet actors. They got away with that crass self-promotion amongst social media followers, but for their opponents and victims seeing these NATO “heroes” playing at rescue-selfies was the last straw.
In fact, this over-honest self-revelation to their supporters became the start of efforts to expose the White Helmets as a criminal enterprise of the UK and US governments, whose members we now know to have been closely involved in some of the worst atrocities carried out by the foreign-backed terrorist groups with whom they worked.

The dreadful truth about the “Oscar-nominated” White Helmets began to emerge seriously in December 2016 following the liberation of East Aleppo, when independent journalists – Pierre le Corf, Vanessa Beeley and RT’s Lizzie Phelan and Murad Gazdiev amongst others – were able to see just where these “civil defense volunteers” had been operating; cheek by jowl with the chief terrorist groups holding the east of the city under siege.

Those researches have clearly continued in the two years since, establishing more solid incriminating evidence against the group, but this effort has evidently intensified in recent months following the joint UN-Israeli rescue operation of White Helmets and terrorist leaders from the Golan Heights in July, and their effective disbanding in most areas of Syria.

The results of these researches were presented by the director of the Foundation for the Study of Democracy, Maxim Grigoriev, at a special meeting at the UN HQ in New York just before Christmas. Grigoriev presented videos of interviews he himself conducted with former White Helmets members in Aleppo and Ghouta, along with the extensive findings on the true nature of the White Helmets’ activities, as revealed by Syrian citizens from “rebel-occupied” areas.

The UN meeting, made to a collection of journalists, included personal testimony from Vanessa Beeley, as well as direct and demanding presentations from Syria’s UN rep Bashar al Jaafari, and Russian envoy Vassily Nebenzia. Independent journalist Eva Bartlett, who has also played a lead role in researching and exposing the White Helmets operation, has written already on the meeting, and particularly noting the complete failure of the Western corporate media to report it or attempt to answer the criticisms and claims made against the group.

Despite the presence of a CBS reporter, who asked a question about the threat from foreign extremists following the “US withdrawal from Syria”, media support for the White Helmets continues without a hiccup, with this horrific contribution from the Guardian’s Kareem Shaheen.
What Grigoriev presented was truly shocking, and categorical evidence that the White Helmets is a criminal organization and should be on the UN’s list of designated terrorist organizations – as stated clearly by Vassily Nebenzia. The video presentation lasts over an hour, but is really essential viewing; the atrocities carried out by the many members of the White Helmets, with the full knowledge and support of the UK and US governments, make their continued feting and lionizing by Western governments and media a crime against humanity.

Quite simply, these men are guilty of the most brutal and barbaric crimes against innocent people – women and children in particular – that we can possibly imagine. Unlike so many dreadful atrocities committed in the past – the Crusaders’ slaughter of Jerusalem’s population might spring to mind – these modern-day barbarians acted in cold blood, calculated and sadistic; even in their fake rescue operations -

A former White Helmet interviewed in Aleppo by Grigoriev describes how, in the filming of one such “rescue” following an alleged Syrian airstrike, bodies were brought from the morgue and wounded people brought from a nearby hospital just for the propaganda video. Children were also often used in these stunt-videos, as well as dummies, confirming the long-held suspicions of impartial analysts.

As has been observed before, including by myself, the treatment of children by White Helmets members in their propaganda videos actually constitutes serious child abuse or even torture – their filming of “treatment for gas exposure” in Douma hospital, or simple brutalisation - as with the use of Omran Daqneesh, turns instantly from humanitarian act to inhuman one when seen in its true light.
Omran Daqneesh, and Hassan Diab – the White Helmets’ Douma victim who went to the Hague to testify, were however reunited with their parents physically intact; they were the lucky ones. As Omar al Mustafa testified when interviewed by Maxim Grigoriev –
 “People evacuated by the White Helmets often did not come back alive. For example, a person receives a minor injury, is rescued, evacuated, and then brought back with their stomach cut open and with their internal organs missing. I heard that a little girl was injured. They took her to Turkey and brought her back in three days, dead and with no internal organs.”
Grigoriev heard similar stories from a great many people including White Helmets members, leading him to state that:
A large body of evidence allows for a clear conclusion that the White Helmets centres were a key element in the system of forced removal of human organs.
We need to just let that sink in a bit. The forced removal of human organs; from children “rescued” by our own countries’ mercenaries. And even if the likes of the Guardian and the NYT and CBS prefer to put this reality in the too hard basket, have no doubt that the White Helmets’ backup teams will be taking Russia’s evidence very seriously.

Seriously enough to consider cutting and running even? As Nebenzia says – “the sponsors share responsibility for their crimes.” And their liars’ luck might be about to run out; we can only hope!

Saturday, December 29, 2018

From Censure to chips; Canada's history replete with human rights violations

Canada Tries to Use International Law to Support Imperialism https://ahtribune.com/world/americas/2742-canada-international-law-imperialism.html
Like the shopkeeper in the Monty Python dead parrot sketch who insists a deceased bird is actually alive, imperialist aggression against Venezuela is turned into promotion of the “international rules-based order”.

At the opening of the UN assembly in September Justin Trudeau said the International Criminal Court is a “useful and important way of promoting an international rules-based order.” Simultaneously, Canada announced it (with five South American nations) would ask the ICC to investigate the Venezuelan government, which is the first time a government has been formally brought before the tribunal by another member.

Liberal officials and the sycophantic media portrayed Canada’s move to bring Caracas before the ICC as a challenge to the US. Evan Dyer reported, “Government sources told CBC that Canada’s decision to refer Venezuela is also meant as a show of support for the ICC, an institution this country believes in that is under attack” from the Trump administration. In other words, Ottawa will challenge Washington by showing Trump how the “international rules-based” ICC can undermine a government the US and Canada are seeking to overthrow through unilateral sanctions, support for the opposition and threatening an invasion, which all contravene the UN Charter.

Unfortunately, some people are willing to buy a dead bird for a pet, the proof of which is that the “international rules-based” ICC Trudeau is promoting has previously been employed to enable violations of international law. In 2011 ICC chief prosecutor Luis Moreno-Ocampo helped set the stage for NATO’s war on Libya, which contravened UN resolutions 1970 and 1973. (Ottawa defied the UN Security Council resolutions authorizing a no-fly zone to protect Libyan civilians by dispatching ground forces, delivering weaponry to the opposition and bombing in service of regime change.) Moreno-Ocampo’s immediate condemnation of Gaddafi helped justify NATO violence. Amidst NATO’s violation of UN Security Council resolution 1973, Ocampo issued arrest warrants  for Gaddafi, his son Saif al-Islam and Libyan intelligence chief Abdullah al-Senussi. These charges for crimes against humanity were used to justify  regime change efforts. At the time Moreno-Ocampo echoed the outlandish claim that Gaddafi distributed Viagra to his troops “to enhance  the possibility to rape”. Three months into the bombing campaign, Moreno-Ocampo told a press conference: “we have information that there was a policy to rape in Libya those who were against the government. Apparently he [Gaddafi] used it to punish people.”(Amnesty International’s senior crisis response adviser Donatella Rovera, who was in Libya for three months after the start of the uprising and Liesel Gerntholtz, head of women’s rights at Human Rights Watch, were unable to find any basis for the mass rape claims.)

A 2017 Der Spiegel English investigation titled “The Ocampo Affair A Former ICC Chief’s Dubious Links” notes, “Ocampo’s correspondence shows that he made agreements with the French and the British, and behaved as part of the anti-Gadhafi coalition.”
MORE...

    A Vancouver Publication Accuses the CBC of “Lying” to Canadians About Venezuela

A forerunner to the ICC, the Canadian-backed International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) helped justify NATO’s illegal 78-day bombing of Serbia. While the worst atrocities of the Yugoslav wars took place in the early 1990s, ICTY Chief Prosecutor Louise Arbour hastily prepared to prosecute Serb President Slobodan Milosevic for rights violations at the start of 1999. Just prior to the NATO bombing Arbour brought along the international media for a stunt where she claimed Milosevic was blocking her from investigating a massacre in the Kosovar village of Racak. Subsequent investigations into what happened at Racak were inconclusive despite widespread reporting of a Serbian massacre, which was used to justify NATO’s illegal bombing.

Amidst NATO’s military intervention without UN approval — the “supreme international crime”— the future Canadian Supreme Court Justice indicted Milosevic and four associates for war crimes. In a 2000 article titled “Louise Arbour: Unindicted War Criminal” Christopher Black and Edward Herman write, “Arbour and the Tribunal thus present us with the amazing spectacle of an institution supposedly organized to contain, prevent, and prosecute for war crimes actually knowingly facilitating them.”

The idea that bringing Venezuela to the ICC will strengthen the “international rules-based order” would be funny if it wasn’t an escalation in a dangerous campaign to oust an elected government.


Thursday, December 27, 2018

2019: a new chapter of the dispute for the future

 
For these times of the year there are usually calls for harmony and fraternal coexistence. Putting aside the hypocrisy of those who conceive of "social peace" as a mechanism to shield injustice, there is no doubt that the people at this time honestly wish for a period of greater warmth, closeness and humanity. In the same way that they express with sincerity of heart, auguries of a better year.
2019: a new chapter of the dispute for the future

After the truce, the illusion of the end of the year vanishes, revealing that none of the conflicts has truly disappeared. What ran aground on the shores of the new year is there, waiting for the new tide of events, of a swell that brings with it transformation. Swell in which we are in danger of being dragged, of not being able to reflect, to see more clearly and to position ourselves in front of the main conflicts.

This applies in the same way to those who claim to hold positions of presumed "impartiality", close in many cases to flight or decommitment, cynicism, indifference and, of course, not? also to fear, disappointment, threat, segregation, blackmail or persecution. Still founded, passivity, non-election, have the consequence of becoming an object and not subject of the circumstances to come.

The conflicts

The existing conflicts are polarities, fields of "social magnetism", around which the great human groups will be added in the coming years. The direction that events take will depend on the potential that each polarity accumulates.

The problems are intimately intertwined, forming a structure in which some pieces link with others. However, they can be observed in detail without awarding them priority, linearity or hierarchies.
Equality of opportunity vs. social exclusion

Article 25 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights states that "Everyone has the right to an adequate standard of living that guarantees him, as well as his family, health and well-being, and especially food, clothing, housing, medical assistance and necessary social services; he also has the right to insurance in case of unemployment, illness, disability, widowhood, old age or other cases of loss of his means of subsistence due to circumstances beyond his control. "

70 years after this Declaration was consecrated, the reality is quite different. According to the report "Reward work, not wealth" (Oxfam International, 2018) the richest 1% continues to accumulate more wealth than the rest of humanity. Citing different sources, the same report states that "about 43% of the active young population does not have a job or, if they work, they still live in poverty. More than 500 million young people survive on less than $ 2 a day. "

In Latin America and the Caribbean, in 2017 the richest 10% of the population concentrated 68% of the total wealth, while the poorest 50% had only 3.5% to survive, adds the aforementioned source.
On the other hand, 821 million people suffer from hunger in the world - one in nine - and more than 150 million children suffer from stunting, the UN said in a report released last September in Rome. Far from retreating, hunger has increased in the last three years, returning to the levels of ten years ago.

Faced with this barbarism, political efforts to alleviate inequality and hunger are artfully fought by those who generate the problem - banking and business corporations - in an irrational spiral of economic violence that throws the large groups to suffocation and despair .

The scale of the grievance corresponds to a social genocide that is behind the "inviolability" of private property, that is, of unlimited accumulation. In the face of outrageous size, the articulation of majorities under the banner of social inclusion and the demercantilization of dignified subsistence is historically inevitable, but it must be accelerated.

Self-determination, cooperation, integration vs. unilateralism and nationalism

The possibility of equal relations between nations, many of them newly emancipated from colonialism after the Second World War, was buried by the confrontation of blocks first and by globalization later, overwhelming all possible self-determination. Given this new dependence, the countries of the global South determined to assert their autonomy, amplified their bilateral relations and built diverse multilateral mechanisms. The objective of integrating virtues and weaknesses was to make common force against de facto usurpation. At the same time, actors such as China, India and Russia emerged or resurfaced on the world board, undermining the unique power of the US (and the West) in the international sphere.



The nationalisms that have arisen throughout the world and those governing today in many countries result from a reaction to the unipolar world domination attempt and the transfer of power from the States to the transnational corporations, such as resistance to the factual centralization of economic power contrary to popular needs. . At the same time, the decline of Western power seeks to defend itself from its final decline by breaking the international rules of the game at the moment when it begins to lose the game, trying once again to impose its own interest as the only possible rule.

Faced with the irrationality of the single power, the solidary relationship between peoples and states, cooperation, the self-determination of peoples and their growing integration towards a new paradigm of "universal human nation", the struggle for the deconcentration of the power of transnational corporations they appear as the path to travel.

Wars or Peace

The colonial interest to monopolize resources and markets, to impose unique cultural norms, continues in force. That interest, along with the gigantic arms business, continues to be the promoter of wars. The existing historical rivalries, are not the cause of the war massacres, but are revived and propagated by the powers to divide, face and conquer.

Faced with this destructive frenzy, the banner of peace supposes a proposal and revolutionary conduct, since it constitutes a step of superior conscience essential to face true challenges of popular unity and liberation from subjugation.

Participatory democracy to defeat fascism

The democratic schemes are severely damaged. The people are effectively away from any decision and elected officials often move away from their constituents living in autistic spaces, also taking advantage of the benefits of their privileged position. The exception, those militants or leaders, who on the basis of an ironclad service to the people try to escape from this pandemic, are attacked by the media dominated by capital, judged by non-existent causes and condemned without evidence.

Lawfare, the persecution and political proscription of popular leaders, the McCarthyism of the right-wing governments, are antibodies to the plutocracy of money that rejects any "democratic interference in their internal affairs", that is, in their business.

The characters of the extreme right have the support of capital to suppress revolts and guarantee their protection. But they also attract the adherence of a large part of the common people, blinded by a resentment manipulated by the media but also fed up with a parody of self-referential democracy. In the perception of this broad sector, "really existing" democracy has become sterile, incoherent, deceitful, debased, incapable of putting an end to injustice and solving popular needs.

The future democracy will have to be deep or it can not be reconstituted. The only way to regenerate the democratic spirit, while balancing the enormous antidemocratic counterweight of economic power, will be to give broad participation to the peoples in the decisions. Participatory democracy will be extended, in a learning of errors and successes, to finally give ground to the "Ancien Régime" of a representation co-opted by real power.

Food Sovereignty, Good Living and Agrarian Reform vs. climate catastrophe

Capitalism is synonymous with human and environmental violence. The common resources of the planet are alienated by a minority that takes advantage of positions of force to dominate the rest. The irrationality of waste, the unequal energy use between North and South, the permanent extraction and contamination of soil, air, water basins, agricultural monoculture, real estate speculation. The carbonic exhalation of an exalted world, deforestation, the poisoning of crops, frantic consumption ... is there anything sustainable about it? There is no "sustainable capitalism" or "green technology" that makes it sustainable, since the maximization of profit - the motor energy of capital - does not tolerate ecological limitations. Private revenue does not accept collective reasons.

Therefore, the only real safeguard of the environment that makes life possible on this planet goes through the systemic transformation towards a way of life that places as a central value the distribution of wealth as a finite and common good. A new system that consecrates the right to share, despises unbridled consumption as irrelevant to happiness and prioritizes collective well-being over individual egoism.

Feminism vs patriarchy


The massive mobilization of women demanding the end of a system of patriarchal domination will continue to be one of the central issues on the political agenda of the new year. The conflict will be one of the main axes of intergenerational tension and will become enormously important when discussing habits rooted in different cultures, reaching an unprecedented global dimension.

Women will be a key factor in the re-definition of power relations in the face of the conservative reaction produced by the vortex of changes, the existential uncertainties and the lack of opportunities for subsistence and human development presented by the current system.

Universal citizenship vs. criminalization and discrimination of migrants

There will be no wall, fence or army that manages to contain the desperate migration, if it does not end with wars, hunger, violence produced by misery, local inequality and between regions of the world.

There will be no fair and free migration, if companies insist on attracting precarious labor, in a situation of illegality, to evade responsibilities derived from current labor law. Discrimination will not disappear, while immigrants are blamed for the lack of work, instead of pointing to the productive emptying of usurious and speculative capitalism.

Universal citizenship, the freedom to choose the place of belonging and the equality of rights for all human beings beyond their provenance, will only become reality within the framework of a new system, as already outlined in previous sections.

Sense of community and renewed transformative project vs retrograde advance

Many human beings feel dragged by fast events that do not dominate, leaving behind well-known realities in the family, work, professional and relationship world. We live in an accelerated world that erases from the face of the earth that landscape that we thought would last forever. In a few years, little of the previous remains, except in the memory ... and the history books.

That is one of the vertices that lead to longing for a lost world, to idealize with nostalgia the past, to criticize the "new customs", to demand the return of an irrecoverable reality. It is one of the main factors that motivate retrograde vision.

This vision is fed by the accumulation of present social difficulties already outlined, which press for quick exits. The personal and social anguish is multiplied by the loneliness, the transience of ties of relationship and the rupture of belongings that give shelter in the midst of gales of insecurities and violence. To all this is added the banality of a world that exhausts its options in a consumerist hedonism, in a tiring journey that fatally leads to death.

All this explains why the conservative ecclesiastical options advance, offering an attractive offer in the face of the abandonment and exclusion of an accelerated, empty and violent civilization.

To this counterhistorical correntada one must oppose a strong and non-transigible project of social transformation, which in addition to contemplating physical and biological needs, also contains the emotional and existential ones. A social practice that holds each person in a community fabric.

A project that ponders human beings on all other considerations and that in itself, endows a new meaning to human life. A sense of evolution, of collective growth, that allows the birth of a renewed human species, that gives wings to the old myth of the New Woman and Man.

To this statement we should dedicate our efforts, unite in our struggles, towards that horizon to converge the welcome diversity.

Have good festivities and renew energies for the year that begins, a new chapter in the dispute for the future.

Contrast in poverty vs. wealth