The Zionist “narrative”
by José Blanco: Some time ago people began to talk about post-truth in the world. The Royal Academy made a precise meaning: “Deliberate distortion of a reality, which manipulates beliefs and emotions in order to influence public opinion and social attitudes.” Later, demagogues and other similar individuals believed that humans tell themselves their own story, or “narrative,” which includes a life goal, a promised land, an illusion that we believe directs our lives. It is possible to change this “narrative,” they say, through a political speech that sounds credible, built with a bag of post-truth, as suits the speakers of the speech. The belief in manipulation, through an ad hoc “narrative”, is in force throughout the world in the voice of the dominant groups.
This spurious belief does not take into account that people's ideas are formed mainly by the concrete life experience of people and, more importantly, by the experiences of communities and social groups. The collective experiences are sifted by these groups and a history and basic ideas are formed that these groups keep for themselves. The “narratives” disappear, which is why the attempt at manipulation is continuous.
The “narrative” of the Zionist government about the murders it is committing in a tiny Gaza that it keeps surrounded, is shared by the dominant groups – and their subordinates – of the United States (EU), of Canada (which all the time hides among the faralá of the gringo skirts), and from several European countries. This “narrative” is impressive for its failed attempt at manipulation, for its radical falsehood, its obvious shamelessness, and its nonsense of continuing it without further ado. The planetary right has lost even the slightest notion of balance. The massive marches around the planet, which will continue to increase, fully prove this.
Antonio Guterres, Secretary General of the UN, said it with the simplicity of a truth shared by (almost) everyone: “Hamas did not emerge from nowhere. The Palestinian people have been subjected to a suffocating occupation for 56 years.
They saw their lands gradually filled with settlements, they were subjected to violence, their economies were stifled, people were displaced, their homes demolished. Their hopes for a political solution to their plight are fading.” So are the things. But the Zionist government launched false discursive firecrackers, said it was resigning from the UN, and has shouted against those, like Guterres, who contextualized the Hamas attack, called "terrorist" by the West: it turns out that this "narrative" includes the attempt to ban it. practice of putting into context, horizontal and historical, the facts that are to be understood. Amazing. But the pretension is so clumsy and absurd that things continue their course: the Zionist government sinks into total discredit.
A few days ago the main page of Middle East Eye, one of the most consulted portals about the Middle East, did not report, but rather issued a warning: in Gaza the slaughter of civilians is continuous, do something, it cried: "The number of Palestinians killed and missing exceeds the death toll of the Srebrenica genocide. More than 8 thousand dead or missing, presumably trapped under the rubble.” During the Bosnian War, between April 1992 and December 1995, the largest massacre on European soil since World War II occurred in Srebrenica, according to Wiki historical records. In Gaza we are seeing the beginnings of an outcome that will surpass that massacre. that massacre.
Hamas and the current massacre in Gaza are a consequence of the Zionist government of Israel's objective of ethnic cleansing of the Palestinian people – a “crime without a name,” Winston Churchill called that crime – and of the policy of whistles and flutes in the Middle East. operated by the governments of Bill Clinton, George W. Bush, Barack Obama, Donald Trump and Joe Biden, in complete disagreement with each other, accompanied by the argument of bombs and murders against the “terrorism” that the United States invented as its enemy universal wildcard. In the last 15 days, the United States has launched airstrikes against pro-Iranian groups in eastern Syria, according to Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin, in response to around twenty strikes with drones and rockets against American military bases in Syria and Iraq. What are those bases doing there? Well, the US has them in more than fifty countries.
On September 22, 1967, after the Six-Day War, veteran anti-Zionist Israeli socialist Moshe Machover signed a public statement that said: “Occupation implies foreign rule. Foreign rule implies resistance. Resistance implies repression. Repression implies terror and counterterrorism. The victims of terror are mostly innocent people. Clinging to the occupied territories will turn us into a nation of murderers and murder victims."
'FIGHT FOR FREEDOM'
All art is political in the sense that it involves society in some way, either influencing it or influenced by it. But some works speak more directly to concerns related to human rights, corruption, class distribution, wealth or power. The painting is directly aimed at a political cause, endorsement or message
The created social motive; by Elizabeth H. Elys “Fight for Freedom” tells the world about the political prisoner Nadir Siguencia, a social activist who for decades continues to suffer savage persecution by the state. In captivity he was brutally tortured by his sadistic Canadian captors for more than a year, with courage he bravely resisted his painful experience fighting from the dungeons located around the province of Ontario for his freedom, a political right, liberation from slavery, power or the right to act, speak or think what one wants, Freedom in independence, Freedom in emancipation...
No comments:
Post a Comment