How long to believe that Guaidó exists?
Why the United States, apparently, without thinking or doubting it, supported a tarnished and anonymous character like Juan Guaidó?
Was it only because he, although he came from a minority party and made an emergency replacement for Leopoldo Lopez, the rich and unruly prisoner, served as president of a collateral National Assembly and whose coincidental objectives coincided?
Or, perhaps, Guaidó was not as anonymous as we thought, or was not so anonymous for the veteran hawks of Washington, who saw his adventures in the curriculum at George Washington University, in the US capital, for twelve years, and for the Center for Applied Non-Violent Action and Strategies (Center for Applied Nonviolent Action and Strategies, CANVAS), in Belgrade? (Grayzone, 2019).
How do the professors of this undercover kindergarten financed by the NED and USAID, the Serbian laureate Srdja Popovic and Slobodan Djinovic, who proclaim a double-edged peace since they beat Slobodan Milosevic, at the same time assert that The ferocity of former students in Venezuela is just a stagnation on the road to close change? (Popovic and Djinovic, 2017).
Stagnation is not related to suspending or stopping the course of something and not, on the contrary, encouraging it and giving it free rein at the point of barbarities, stones, and the burning of facilities and people?
Is non-violent action applied, then, not peace? Are the strategies we are talking about not, therefore, to achieve democracy? Did they like this search for the regional weakening of the opponents of Washington, what in their heart were the misnamed "Arab springs" to which they devoted themselves, and ended up being remedies worse than the disease?
How global and how much of local?
Are the maneuvers of boycott and destruction of Venezuela another sophisticated, but judicious, method of attacking China, Russia and Iran? Who dares to maintain, at this point, that they are not part of the global strategy against the greater resistance that American hegemony has today?
Did the planned assassination against President Maduro with drones loaded with C4 not lead to chaos? What incendiary materials would Guaidó pass with honors in the CIA and what values and ethics did he cross at the UCB?
Would it be that in the eagerness to take care of the largest oil reserves on the planet, one of the largest gold, gas and woodland artificial timber pantries on the globe, as well as vast deposits of coltan, silica, thorium, diamonds , bauxite, nickel, iron, copper, phosphoric rocks, basalt, kaolin, feldspar, marble and granite, the United States was ready to let itself be cajoled by the devil and did it for some brutal and mediocre young people?
Do we believe Bolton on Fox News when he says that American companies would benefit a lot from Venezuelan oil (Grayzone, 2019), whose participation they already share, or swallow the idea that their country will be self-sufficient thanks to fracking, a lie in the proclaimed projection (Hughes, 2018) and a costly mechanism in every sense: in investment, socially and environmentally?
How is it that the United States maintains the sanctions against Venezuela until the country returns to the democratic order and in order to prevent corruption, and that to do so resort precisely to bribing the military (one of the worst forms of corruption), and do they skip the constitutional talanqueras of the country and of course the jurisdictional ones of the international order?
What democracy is that of which they themselves lack and that, nevertheless, they are scattering around the world between excuses and at the point of missiles and massacres? Where are the limits of the hypocrisy of a country that slogans everywhere, from the Declaration of Independence to the Constitution and the successive amendments, words contradicted in their essence of nation: freedom, and is a country of slaves; equality, and it is the absence of equity; justice, and it is the overflow of iniquities; pluralism, and even in the mood prevails the puritan uniformity?
Will the falcon fallow be more damaging?
What advantages would Trump, the emperor of the less sacred American empire, see in an opposition whose merit has been to provoke fatal guards every two or three years and hold the record number of losing eighteen elections in twenty years? What reserved perfection did the counselors of the White House distinguish in Guaidó, which other mortals see still can not?
And how is it that a racist by heritage and a white supremacist born of convictions like Trump endorses the mulatto Guaidó? Something dark will be in the sprain to the faith in addition to the renegotiated extra heavy oil of the Orinoco Strip?
Why the United States, apparently, without thinking or doubting it, supported a tarnished and anonymous character like Juan Guaidó?
Was it only because he, although he came from a minority party and made an emergency replacement for Leopoldo Lopez, the rich and unruly prisoner, served as president of a collateral National Assembly and whose coincidental objectives coincided?
Or, perhaps, Guaidó was not as anonymous as we thought, or was not so anonymous for the veteran hawks of Washington, who saw his adventures in the curriculum at George Washington University, in the US capital, for twelve years, and for the Center for Applied Non-Violent Action and Strategies (Center for Applied Nonviolent Action and Strategies, CANVAS), in Belgrade? (Grayzone, 2019).
How do the professors of this undercover kindergarten financed by the NED and USAID, the Serbian laureate Srdja Popovic and Slobodan Djinovic, who proclaim a double-edged peace since they beat Slobodan Milosevic, at the same time assert that The ferocity of former students in Venezuela is just a stagnation on the road to close change? (Popovic and Djinovic, 2017).
Stagnation is not related to suspending or stopping the course of something and not, on the contrary, encouraging it and giving it free rein at the point of barbarities, stones, and the burning of facilities and people?
Is non-violent action applied, then, not peace? Are the strategies we are talking about not, therefore, to achieve democracy? Did they like this search for the regional weakening of the opponents of Washington, what in their heart were the misnamed "Arab springs" to which they devoted themselves, and ended up being remedies worse than the disease?
How global and how much of local?
Are the maneuvers of boycott and destruction of Venezuela another sophisticated, but judicious, method of attacking China, Russia and Iran? Who dares to maintain, at this point, that they are not part of the global strategy against the greater resistance that American hegemony has today?
Did the planned assassination against President Maduro with drones loaded with C4 not lead to chaos? What incendiary materials would Guaidó pass with honors in the CIA and what values and ethics did he cross at the UCB?
Would it be that in the eagerness to take care of the largest oil reserves on the planet, one of the largest gold, gas and woodland artificial timber pantries on the globe, as well as vast deposits of coltan, silica, thorium, diamonds , bauxite, nickel, iron, copper, phosphoric rocks, basalt, kaolin, feldspar, marble and granite, the United States was ready to let itself be cajoled by the devil and did it for some brutal and mediocre young people?
Do we believe Bolton on Fox News when he says that American companies would benefit a lot from Venezuelan oil (Grayzone, 2019), whose participation they already share, or swallow the idea that their country will be self-sufficient thanks to fracking, a lie in the proclaimed projection (Hughes, 2018) and a costly mechanism in every sense: in investment, socially and environmentally?
How is it that the United States maintains the sanctions against Venezuela until the country returns to the democratic order and in order to prevent corruption, and that to do so resort precisely to bribing the military (one of the worst forms of corruption), and do they skip the constitutional talanqueras of the country and of course the jurisdictional ones of the international order?
What democracy is that of which they themselves lack and that, nevertheless, they are scattering around the world between excuses and at the point of missiles and massacres? Where are the limits of the hypocrisy of a country that slogans everywhere, from the Declaration of Independence to the Constitution and the successive amendments, words contradicted in their essence of nation: freedom, and is a country of slaves; equality, and it is the absence of equity; justice, and it is the overflow of iniquities; pluralism, and even in the mood prevails the puritan uniformity?
Will the falcon fallow be more damaging?
What advantages would Trump, the emperor of the less sacred American empire, see in an opposition whose merit has been to provoke fatal guards every two or three years and hold the record number of losing eighteen elections in twenty years? What reserved perfection did the counselors of the White House distinguish in Guaidó, which other mortals see still can not?
And how is it that a racist by heritage and a white supremacist born of convictions like Trump endorses the mulatto Guaidó? Something dark will be in the sprain to the faith in addition to the renegotiated extra heavy oil of the Orinoco Strip?
Who cheated whom in the network of deceptions that plotted against President Maduro and his government? Did obsessive compulsive National Security Advisor John Bolton cheat the tug-of-war Guaidó?
Is it happening that Bolton is no longer the Bolton of 2003, the sepulchral architect of Iraq, and Guaidó will never be the Guaidó who believed that he could become great? How long will John Bollton of John Guaidó? Or Guaidó is a tolerable blackface stereotype (face painted black)?
Did an inexperienced pupil get an old fox entangled like Elliot Abrams? Were there traps in the hunting ground called Venezuela and the old predator fell into them? Could it be that the Elliot of the eighties has been an Abrams three decades older and a few inches less fox?
Dependent members or dependent allies?
When did you come to the United States to trust an opposition that is incapable of trusting itself? Did you not see the multicellular animal that is and survives thanks to the continuous division of cells and the voracity of power of leaders imprisoned by violent or exiled by corrupt?
The Americans were not struck by the fact that the Democratic Unity Table (MUD), the hodgepodge of 35 parties that won the majority in the National Assembly from which Guaidó left, ended up dissolved and with the brothers again transformed into the incompatible factions of always?
How long will the alliances stuck with slime last, and how much will the Americans benefit from a few partners who are nudging the stage like their president Trump at a summit?
Veni, vidi, vici non? (I came, I saw, I did not win?)
Why, if everything were to be consummated on February 23, from the fading of Maduro and the disappearance of the PSUV and the hordes of Chávez, Maduristas, Socialists, Communists, and all of those below, the poorest, and the outsiders, the peripherals and the excluded, up to the mass adhesion of two hundred thousand soldiers to Guaidó and the unhesitating compliance with the orders of Commander Trump, did not happen even?
Why, after not even passing a sack of harinapán on the Simón BolÃvar bridge, the few times the issue is mentioned is done without conviction or force, as if to get out of the way or fulfill the superior mandate?
What happened to Richard Branson, the pirate philanthropist? He returned to his own, the space conquest, Space is Virgin territory (space is virgin territory) (Branson, 2018), which should not have been diverted to promote the violation of a border and to open businesses to the virginal nothing company of his property?
How is it that Cúcuta suddenly returned to the normality of the national indifference towards the borders, when a few weeks ago an airline ticket was not purchased to visit it and from one day to another the airlines do not get a passenger to their destination?
How many flies enter the open mouth?
Why is Ivan Duque launching against the Venezuelan government since he was the man Uribe said and remains equally mountainous against the neighbors even when his boss becomes the one who recoils? Did Duque's stalwarts leave him alone, again, and crawl around the floor looking for lost revenues for the electoral piggy banks of 2020 and 2022?
The Colombian president is entangled alone, and his head deteriorates in the passion for football and mouth in diplomatic inexperience? Did he push himself without the help of the comfortable armchair of anonymity into the fierce arena of discrediting, or did he even require the push of the hand that rocks his crib?
Who will be so capable of specifying what they were unable to do, among others, President Duque in Colombia, Moreno in Ecuador, Bolsonaro in Brazil, Macri in Argentina, Trump in the United States: open their brains and close their mouths, and then to be able to thank them themselves?
How to recover the Venezuelan oil with the officials of gringo companies?
What would the appointed interim president Guaidó appoint a Transitory Council of Administration of Petroleos de Venezuela, PDVSA, and its refiner Citgo Petroleum Corp., the eighth largest in the United States, if it will lack authority and, above all, access to the assets?
Could it be that the former analyst of deranged positions of Fox News, John Bolton, is giving course to the illegal announcements made by the end of January, through Fox Business, when in an outburst of honesty expressed that the goal of the encerrona against Venezuela is its Petroleum?
How is it that a National Assembly in contempt, whose acts are legally void, appoints a Board of Directors made up of figures directly related to the US oil and financial companies, who hover around like raptors? (Guaidó, 2019). The subsidiary Citgo was opened for the purpose of the parent company, and was filled with oil experts, skillful speculators, but ignorant absolute in the real affairs of the country? (Reuters, 2019).
Is it happening that Bolton is no longer the Bolton of 2003, the sepulchral architect of Iraq, and Guaidó will never be the Guaidó who believed that he could become great? How long will John Bollton of John Guaidó? Or Guaidó is a tolerable blackface stereotype (face painted black)?
Did an inexperienced pupil get an old fox entangled like Elliot Abrams? Were there traps in the hunting ground called Venezuela and the old predator fell into them? Could it be that the Elliot of the eighties has been an Abrams three decades older and a few inches less fox?
Dependent members or dependent allies?
When did you come to the United States to trust an opposition that is incapable of trusting itself? Did you not see the multicellular animal that is and survives thanks to the continuous division of cells and the voracity of power of leaders imprisoned by violent or exiled by corrupt?
The Americans were not struck by the fact that the Democratic Unity Table (MUD), the hodgepodge of 35 parties that won the majority in the National Assembly from which Guaidó left, ended up dissolved and with the brothers again transformed into the incompatible factions of always?
How long will the alliances stuck with slime last, and how much will the Americans benefit from a few partners who are nudging the stage like their president Trump at a summit?
Veni, vidi, vici non? (I came, I saw, I did not win?)
Why, if everything were to be consummated on February 23, from the fading of Maduro and the disappearance of the PSUV and the hordes of Chávez, Maduristas, Socialists, Communists, and all of those below, the poorest, and the outsiders, the peripherals and the excluded, up to the mass adhesion of two hundred thousand soldiers to Guaidó and the unhesitating compliance with the orders of Commander Trump, did not happen even?
Why, after not even passing a sack of harinapán on the Simón BolÃvar bridge, the few times the issue is mentioned is done without conviction or force, as if to get out of the way or fulfill the superior mandate?
What happened to Richard Branson, the pirate philanthropist? He returned to his own, the space conquest, Space is Virgin territory (space is virgin territory) (Branson, 2018), which should not have been diverted to promote the violation of a border and to open businesses to the virginal nothing company of his property?
How is it that Cúcuta suddenly returned to the normality of the national indifference towards the borders, when a few weeks ago an airline ticket was not purchased to visit it and from one day to another the airlines do not get a passenger to their destination?
How many flies enter the open mouth?
Why is Ivan Duque launching against the Venezuelan government since he was the man Uribe said and remains equally mountainous against the neighbors even when his boss becomes the one who recoils? Did Duque's stalwarts leave him alone, again, and crawl around the floor looking for lost revenues for the electoral piggy banks of 2020 and 2022?
The Colombian president is entangled alone, and his head deteriorates in the passion for football and mouth in diplomatic inexperience? Did he push himself without the help of the comfortable armchair of anonymity into the fierce arena of discrediting, or did he even require the push of the hand that rocks his crib?
Who will be so capable of specifying what they were unable to do, among others, President Duque in Colombia, Moreno in Ecuador, Bolsonaro in Brazil, Macri in Argentina, Trump in the United States: open their brains and close their mouths, and then to be able to thank them themselves?
How to recover the Venezuelan oil with the officials of gringo companies?
What would the appointed interim president Guaidó appoint a Transitory Council of Administration of Petroleos de Venezuela, PDVSA, and its refiner Citgo Petroleum Corp., the eighth largest in the United States, if it will lack authority and, above all, access to the assets?
Could it be that the former analyst of deranged positions of Fox News, John Bolton, is giving course to the illegal announcements made by the end of January, through Fox Business, when in an outburst of honesty expressed that the goal of the encerrona against Venezuela is its Petroleum?
How is it that a National Assembly in contempt, whose acts are legally void, appoints a Board of Directors made up of figures directly related to the US oil and financial companies, who hover around like raptors? (Guaidó, 2019). The subsidiary Citgo was opened for the purpose of the parent company, and was filled with oil experts, skillful speculators, but ignorant absolute in the real affairs of the country? (Reuters, 2019).
What will Mr. Guaidó use so many nominal employees if they do not serve him at all and what will he intend if it is not to pile up the pouches of so many parasites that have not parasitized in Venezuela for two decades? At what level is it true that by appointing Harvard bureaucrats, Guaidó symbolically rewards the wealthy who finance it?
Will the salaries that he does not pay now cancel them in bribes and with interests if in some remote period he had the least chance of being president and he was? How long would it take to be crazy to the present struts, as well as to deny the debts to Russia and China, which now recognizes from the lips and without anyone asking? (Forbes Mexico, 2019).
Why does it come back and look like it's going?
¿Guaidó stopped being the viral leader in networks, appointing officials right and left and is once again the street saboteur of all his life? Does the virtual president or the implicit chancellor who visited his impossible embassies return and promises to attend figurative forums?
Or he left consuls and proconsuls only because he ran out of the list of countries that accept that he is part of any government and fear they recognize it as such?
Did Guaidó return to Caracas with his pockets full of stones and with the intention of heading down Chavistas, or just to commit suicide in the Altamira fountain in the same way that Mrs. Woolf once did in the Ouse river? Can anyone who is exempt from the scares of a US retaliation believe that Guaidó has read Virginia Woolf, or that he has looked through any book in his life as an extremist?
How soon will he return to Washington for the due reprimand of his unfinished requiem, with the aggravation of not being Mozart or being a musician? Or, finally, will you grow old in Bogota on the lap of Carmona, another frustrated golpist, waiting to relieve him in oblivion?
How to duplicate a problem that did not exist?
In the end, it was clear to the Americans at the top that after bombings and threats they embedded Nicolás Maduro Moros in the presidency of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela in an unrestricted manner, at least until the end of his current term, in 2025, making him the second, not the opposition in exile or the very distinguished one of Los Palos Grandes, El Rosal, Las Mercedes, El Hatillo or Chacao, as was the purpose, but the pure Venezuelan people who voted for him ?
Would the United States understand that now, in addition to dealing with a reinforced Maduro, they will have to see how they wash away the Guaidó graffiti that they painted on the walls of the Lima Group? Are you already aware that they duplicated your problem?
Was that why Vice President Pence reproached the president "in charge" in Bogotá with whom they were imprisoned? In what fleeting moment did the empire have a man invested as interim president in charge of having a young man in a man's suit that tires everyone with the haste of president immpro and impostor?
Washing your face before or after sabotage?
Who will Trump be in the future if he stops doing what he says he does or if he keeps doing what he does not know, and, above all, if he does not get tired of the few trivial and vain things that he really perpetrates?
How has he managed to raise so much hatred throughout the wide world, for his country and for himself, for the mania to show his teeth to any country that is not kneeling as an employee of Mar-a-Lago or the casinos?
How can someone be what is not without involving the slightest philosophical question? And what kind of former president will Guaidó be when he ceases to be the president he never was?
Will those who consider that this will be a very easy task be taken on track and that is a matter that he only began to take care of with his run, without rhyme or reason, through South America, which in the utopian Renaissance worlds would have been without his unhappy return?
And how the United States will wash the face and leave it presentable for another sabotage, after championing the charade aspaventosa and golpista that proved ineffective to cross the plastic shields of the National Guard and the Bolivarian Army, but an accurate shot in the foot at the moment of breaking down the liar's discourse of solidarity and humanitarianism packed into USAID's insecure rice bags? (RT, 2019).
Cool, yes or cool, no?
Guaidó returns to Venezuela frustrated because the harvest of "Venezuela Aid Live" has been damaged, because of the frustrated attempt of humanitarian aid, because it was not supported by the president in the demand for a cordial military intervention?
Or because in his pilgrimage of needy he received the same countries that had already recognized him with the summary of what they had already said, or, worse, with the draft without review, as in Paraguay?
Will the salaries that he does not pay now cancel them in bribes and with interests if in some remote period he had the least chance of being president and he was? How long would it take to be crazy to the present struts, as well as to deny the debts to Russia and China, which now recognizes from the lips and without anyone asking? (Forbes Mexico, 2019).
Why does it come back and look like it's going?
¿Guaidó stopped being the viral leader in networks, appointing officials right and left and is once again the street saboteur of all his life? Does the virtual president or the implicit chancellor who visited his impossible embassies return and promises to attend figurative forums?
Or he left consuls and proconsuls only because he ran out of the list of countries that accept that he is part of any government and fear they recognize it as such?
Did Guaidó return to Caracas with his pockets full of stones and with the intention of heading down Chavistas, or just to commit suicide in the Altamira fountain in the same way that Mrs. Woolf once did in the Ouse river? Can anyone who is exempt from the scares of a US retaliation believe that Guaidó has read Virginia Woolf, or that he has looked through any book in his life as an extremist?
How soon will he return to Washington for the due reprimand of his unfinished requiem, with the aggravation of not being Mozart or being a musician? Or, finally, will you grow old in Bogota on the lap of Carmona, another frustrated golpist, waiting to relieve him in oblivion?
How to duplicate a problem that did not exist?
In the end, it was clear to the Americans at the top that after bombings and threats they embedded Nicolás Maduro Moros in the presidency of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela in an unrestricted manner, at least until the end of his current term, in 2025, making him the second, not the opposition in exile or the very distinguished one of Los Palos Grandes, El Rosal, Las Mercedes, El Hatillo or Chacao, as was the purpose, but the pure Venezuelan people who voted for him ?
Would the United States understand that now, in addition to dealing with a reinforced Maduro, they will have to see how they wash away the Guaidó graffiti that they painted on the walls of the Lima Group? Are you already aware that they duplicated your problem?
Was that why Vice President Pence reproached the president "in charge" in Bogotá with whom they were imprisoned? In what fleeting moment did the empire have a man invested as interim president in charge of having a young man in a man's suit that tires everyone with the haste of president immpro and impostor?
Washing your face before or after sabotage?
Who will Trump be in the future if he stops doing what he says he does or if he keeps doing what he does not know, and, above all, if he does not get tired of the few trivial and vain things that he really perpetrates?
How has he managed to raise so much hatred throughout the wide world, for his country and for himself, for the mania to show his teeth to any country that is not kneeling as an employee of Mar-a-Lago or the casinos?
How can someone be what is not without involving the slightest philosophical question? And what kind of former president will Guaidó be when he ceases to be the president he never was?
Will those who consider that this will be a very easy task be taken on track and that is a matter that he only began to take care of with his run, without rhyme or reason, through South America, which in the utopian Renaissance worlds would have been without his unhappy return?
And how the United States will wash the face and leave it presentable for another sabotage, after championing the charade aspaventosa and golpista that proved ineffective to cross the plastic shields of the National Guard and the Bolivarian Army, but an accurate shot in the foot at the moment of breaking down the liar's discourse of solidarity and humanitarianism packed into USAID's insecure rice bags? (RT, 2019).
Cool, yes or cool, no?
Guaidó returns to Venezuela frustrated because the harvest of "Venezuela Aid Live" has been damaged, because of the frustrated attempt of humanitarian aid, because it was not supported by the president in the demand for a cordial military intervention?
Or because in his pilgrimage of needy he received the same countries that had already recognized him with the summary of what they had already said, or, worse, with the draft without review, as in Paraguay?
And why is it that Guaidó came back, before threatening the soldiers who do not stop him, to implore his people to turn back to the streets to fuck their own routines of high-income neighborhoods and beg the poor old ladies of San Ignacio and Toulon who shake their jewels with diamonds with the remaining forces?
His return is another coin thrown into the air where he bets that with a face he will win and with a stamp or a cross he will not lose? Do you think that if the Venezuelan Justice dares his capture he transforms him into a martyr and if he does nothing, he will treat the Maduro government as a coward?
How about that Guaidó be right and the United States, for its strategic games of commercial, geopolitical and media wars, promote him from president in charge to plant manager? Or do not have it and that, in the same way that a few weeks ago nobody knew about it, in a few months no one remembers who or what it was?
And how sad that very soon his embaucados followers have to paraphrase the entrance of that Colombian anthem of the South, La Guaneña, and that in Caracas or Bogotá tararen: "Guay, yes no, ¡Guaidónos cheated!"?
Written by Juan Alberto Sánchez MarÃn.
His return is another coin thrown into the air where he bets that with a face he will win and with a stamp or a cross he will not lose? Do you think that if the Venezuelan Justice dares his capture he transforms him into a martyr and if he does nothing, he will treat the Maduro government as a coward?
How about that Guaidó be right and the United States, for its strategic games of commercial, geopolitical and media wars, promote him from president in charge to plant manager? Or do not have it and that, in the same way that a few weeks ago nobody knew about it, in a few months no one remembers who or what it was?
And how sad that very soon his embaucados followers have to paraphrase the entrance of that Colombian anthem of the South, La Guaneña, and that in Caracas or Bogotá tararen: "Guay, yes no, ¡Guaidónos cheated!"?
Written by Juan Alberto Sánchez MarÃn.
1 comment:
Your blogs fucking trash, hope you and your boy Edward are ready to be arrested lmfao
Post a Comment