Canada incites genocide of aborigines The United Nations has censured the Canadian government for its gross violations of the rights of children and has accused the country of "serious and widespread discrimination" against First Nations children.
On Monday, the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child (CRC) issued its formal report on Canada's treatment of children and the country's commitment to the world body's Convention on the Rights of the Child, Canada's.
The CRC accused Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper's government of violating the convention by introducing Bill C-10 to the country's Youth Criminal Justice Act earlier this year.
Bill C-10, which the CRC says does not comply with international standards, allows for harsher penalties for youth offenders and makes it easier for courts to judge them as adults.
The report also expressed concern over the Canadian government's discrimination against its indigenous and black children, who are more likely to be incarcerated than other children.
Many political analysts say that under Stephen Harper's government, human rights abuses in Canada have increased dramatically.
Press TV has conducted an interview with Alfred Lambremont, a human rights lawyer from Vancouver, to further discuss the issue.
No,
it’s not dirty talk — just straight talk on sex, sexting, body parts, consent,
mental health, and other life (or life-saving) skills for kids. “When
Canadian public elementary students are considerate systematically at the
bottom in the world on standardized tests.” The Premier Minister of Ontario revealed: the
updating in sexual education in elementary schools students in Ontario that
both need: for recognizing students in public elementary schools at
the Top of the World!Mrs. Kathleen Wynne instead to bring sex
education to the classrooms in a premature edge, by involving six years old
students, the duty of the Premier of Ontario is to reform the curriculum of
public elementary education schools in Ontario, from grade 1 to 8 with a
quality instruction in the general subjects. The question is Mrs. Premier of
Ontario: elementary students of public schools from grade 1 to 6 in the need to
learn to read and write correctly; are ready to understand and respond to your
implemented and updated sexual education? Besides elementary school students not
only are struggling with readingand writing
skills also are experiencing a very serious difficulties with other subjects as
mathematics, geography, history… and your first concern is to bring to the classrooms
your exigent plan of sexuality to innocent six years old children! The provincial
parliament plan of evil malice against small school children have to be
reviewed by the province of Ontario parents. Also it’s the appropriate moment to
ask the Premier of Ontario for a full investigation about the mental, physical,
and sexual abuse of school children in Ontario for part of the Board of
Education Staff.
No,
it’s not dirty talk — just straight talk on sex, sexting, body parts, consent,
mental health, and other life (or life-saving) skills for kids.
Andrew Francis Wallace / Toronto
Star Order this photo
Premier Kathleen Wynne is finally
implementing an updated sex-ed curriculum for Ontario schools. She oversaw the
reforms as education minister in 2010, but they were shelved by then-premier
Dalton McGuinty for political reasons.
By:Martin Regg Cohn Provincial Politics, Published on Sat Feb 21 2015
A new sex-education curriculum, to
be revealed Monday, will be the talk — and the teaching — in our schools
starting this September.
It’s about time. Five years after
capitulating to a contrived outcry from political and social conservatives, the
Liberal government is finally modernizing our embarrassingly outdated sex-ed
curriculum.
This time, sources say, there will
be no backing down from the badly needed update.
Two separate documents obtained by
the Star — a revamped 240-page Health and Physical Education curriculum for
Grades 1 to 8, and a new 218-page volume for Grades 9 to 12 — will roll out
sex-ed material that isn’t so much explicit as explanatory.
No, it’s not dirty talk — just
straight talk on sex, sexting, body parts, consent, mental health, and other
life (or life-saving) skills for girls and boys. The idea is for teachers to
inoculate students against the ways of the world before they surf the world wild
web on their own.
Our children deserve to learn it all
in classrooms, not be lured in lurid chat rooms.
Yes, children will be taught at an
early age that there is something called a penis. Also a vagina. Get used to it
— Grade 1 kids already are, and child-abuse investigators have long been
calling for it.
In Grade 6, the words “vaginal
lubrication” will be up for discussion. Yes, there is talk of “wet dreams.” And
if kids ask about masturbation in class, yes, the optional “teacher prompt”
advises that it “is not harmful and is one way of learning about your body.”
(Nothing in the preceding paragraph
is part of the official curriculum or obligatory for teachers. The material is
included as optional guidelines, recognizing that many kids are taught sex-ed
by phys-ed teachers who are juggling other roles and appreciate the
professional support.)
Older students will hear the words
“oral sex” — hopefully (and then thankfully) before they ever experience it, so
they can learn why sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are rising. For
similar reasons, anal sex is discussed in later grades — no, not encouraged,
but questions answered.
THE GOVERNMENT ABUSED ABORIGINAL CHILDREN!!!
Here’s a shocker for people who
assume the worst about sex-ed: Grade 7 students will be taught about “delaying
sexual activity,” notably “choosing to abstain from any genital contact;
choosing to abstain from having vaginal or anal intercourse; choosing to
abstain from having oral-genital contact … the reasons for not engaging in
sexual activity; the concept of consent and how consent is communicated.”
Here’s a prompt for Grade 7 teachers
dealing with 12- and 13-year-olds if the issue arises in the classroom:
“Engaging in sexual activities like oral sex, vaginal intercourse, and anal
intercourse means that you can be infected with an STI.”
Is all that best left unsaid, in
hopes of leaving well enough alone? Only if parents are prepared to live with
the consequences — confusing their personal religious faith with blind faith in
teenage behaviour.
While opponents fulminate about the
mere mention of body parts, body language plays an expanded role in the
curriculum, as students learn to read signals while vocalizing their feelings.
There is new material for students about the ins and outs of sexual consent —
the importance of standing up for yourself instead of going to bed with
someone. That means teaching kids to assert themselves rather than remain
silent, and to respect one another.
For all the looming hysteria,
hypocrisy and hyperbole from hypersensitive critics, the updated curriculum
isn’t all about sex or sexuality.
It includes badly needed material on
the plague of cyberbullying that we’ve seen destroy the lives of vulnerable
kids as traditional toilet-stall vulgarisms go viral online.
In a prompt for Grade 5 students,
here’s a suggested response for teachers: “Sharing private sexual photos or
posting sexual comments online is unacceptable and also illegal.”
Teaching materials on mental health,
previously relegated to older grades, will now be introduced in Grade 9,
because the experts thought it more in line with the times.
There is more information on drug
abuse that would be irrelevant to younger kids, and more detail about sexual
orientation.
The background to this
back-to-school curriculum is the research from hundreds of experts in sexual
health and pedagogy — no, pedophiliacs weren’t involved — that even as pregnancy rates are declining, STIs are on
the increase.
Turns out we are better at
preventing babies than protecting kids, who suffer from more disease than
before because we’ve stuck to the status quo. Our existing curriculum is circa
1998, while other provinces have kept up with the sex-ed times to the point
that many Ontario teachers now rely on conservative Alberta’s curriculum as a
resource.
Premier Kathleen Wynne is determined
to go where Dalton McGuinty didn’t dare. When critics pounced, he renounced —
shelving Wynne’s work as the education minister who oversaw the 2010 reforms.
Fearful of a pre-election fight ahead of the 2011 campaign, her predecessor as
premier buckled under pressure — and failed this simple classroom test:
Stick to the facts. Stand by the
research.
Nearly two decades after Ontario’s
last curriculum update — long before broadband reached every home, smartphones
invaded every teenager’s pocket, and cyberbullies pushed aside schoolyard
bullies — Ontario is belatedly recognizing the Internet age. And the age of puberty.
A parent guide to the curriculum, to
be released online Monday, notes that girls “usually enter puberty sometime
between 8 and 13 years of age,” while for boys it ranges from 9 to 14. That’s
why the updated curriculum now introduces some of those more puberty-related
topics in Grade 4, rather than Grade 5.
The political and pedagogical
stakes are high. Wynne is putting her personal credibility on the line as the
government braces for the inevitable backlash from an unholy alliance of social
and political conservatives — right wing opposition opportunists and
fundamentalists who are trying to distort science to fit their distorted views
of religion.
It’s about biology, not ideology.
But there is a Progressive
Conservative leadership race underway in which all three remaining candidates
have discredited and even disgraced themselves by pandering to parents using code language and deceptive rhetoric.
Opponents claim they don’t oppose
sex education, just that parents should teach it at home — which sounds
suspiciously like a home-schooling recipe for unravelling any class-based
curriculum. And assumes that kids would cheerfully absorb parental lectures on
the perils of oral sex (or that teenagers heed their parents about anything).
Some of the more opportunistic
politicians from the Official Opposition say they support sex-ed, they just
want more parental involvement — or as leadership candidate Monte McNaughton argues, while boasting of his credentials as the father of an 18-month-old
— parents should “be at the table.”
Apparently it’s not enough that the
government consulted hundreds of experts, educators, and religious bodies,
reached out to parents from the more than 4,000 elementary schools across
Ontario, have massive support from teachers and their unions in all school
boards, and that public opinion polls show more than 9 in 10 parents are
broadly supportive.
It’s worth noting that the
influential Institute for Catholic Education — an umbrella group comprising the Assembly of Catholic
Bishops, Catholic trustees, principals, teachers and parents — has been
consulted throughout the development of the updated curriculum. It’s also worth
noting that the institute describes itself as “animated by the Gospel and
reflecting the tenets of the Catholic faith.”
Hard to argue with that fidelity to
research and religious faith.
But many still will, loudly and
politically. The curriculum’s opponents should do their homework, lest they
fall behind their own kids.
Martin Regg Cohn’s Ontario politics column appears Tuesday, Thursday and
Sunday. mcohn@thestar.ca ,
Twitter: @reggcohn
Joshua Blakeney is a Calgary-based freelance journalist and activist.
Blakeney's research became national news after being awarded the Queen
Elizabeth II Graduate Scholarship to study the Origins of the Global War
on Terror. Joshua Blakeney is quite an impressive young man. In
this exclusive interview, he deftly, fluidly and eloquently speaks about
Israel's 'unprecedented control over American politics,' and how 9/11
-- via Zionist proxies -- facilitated the War on Terrorism. With his
extensive background in the studies of terrorism and his thesis -- in
which he references a twenty-five year old book by Israeli Prime
Minister Netanyahu -- he hypothesizes that Israel is exporting or
"globalizing" Israeli and Zionist philosophy and policy or "Globalizing
Terrorism and Zionist propaganda."
CANADIAN REGIME:"PARTOF A COMPLOT TODESTROYA DEMOCRATICGOVERNMENT; WHO IS CONCERNEDINTHE PROTECTIONAND
ASSISTANCEOF MARGINALIZED PEOPLE"
Diosdado
Cabello
Credit: Archive
15-02-15.-President of the National
Assembly, Diosdado Cabello, reported Friday that an official from the
Canadian Embassy in Venezuela, was inquiring about the capabilities of
Arturo Michelena Airport Valencia for special cases ..
During a special program broadcast on VTV to introduce new evidence of the dismantled 'Blow Blue',
planned by the right, Hair revealed that Canadian official identified
as Nancy Birbek conducted research on airport facilities carabobeña
capital.
"On Monday along
with another officer of the Canadian Embassy, this lady identified as
Nancy Birbeck, was inquiring about the capabilities thereof (airport)
for special cases. Did this lady is asking about the capabilities of the
airport for contingency cases? "Asked the senator.
In that
sense, Hair linked this with the coup plans that were neutralized by the
security forces and officials FANB, who unveiled the actions to be
carried out against the people and the Bolivarian government.
Cabello added that not only foreign official was performing functions
that do not belong, but also another official embassy in the UK, is also
working on suspicious situations. "But so have you identified and we
know their movements," he said.
In the same issue of foreign
interference in the country's affairs, Cabello said an official of the
US Embassy, in charge of visas, who are performing work outside their
functions in the country. "And we know who he is. And let him. After not
come with that which is official, "he said.
He added that the
actions being implemented in the country's foreign intelligence bodies
are part of the manuals unconventional warfare the US government. "Be
assured you are trying to provoke violence but justice will act. Justice
must he act for the good of this country, "he concluded. http://www.aporrea.org/oposicion/n265329.html CANADIAN REGIME:"PARTOF A COMPLOT TODESTROYA DEMOCRATICGOVERNMENT; WHO IS CONCERNEDINTHE PROTECTIONAND
ASSISTANCEOF MARGINALIZED PEOPLE"
When
authorities revealed the stunning news of an alleged plot to attack a Halifax
shopping mall both police and federal Justice Minister Peter MacKay stressed it
wasn't a terrorist plot.MacKay told reporters at a news conference on Saturday that the alleged
plan appeared to be product of a "group of murderous misfits"
prepared to "wreak havoc and mayhem on our community."Police said
there is no evidence that ideology or culture is part of the allegations. But if
plotting to cause mass murder in a public place is not called terrorism, then
what is?Defining
terrorism is a complex task, one that has preoccupied governments since the
Sept. 11 attacks on New York and Washington, experts say. And with
Prime Minister Stephen Harper's new anti-terror bill before Parliament, taking
a closer look at the Canadian definition is all the more crucial."The problem
of defining terrorism has been a thorny one from the get-go," said
terrorism expert John Thompson, vice president of Strategic Capital and
Intelligence Group."Terrorism
overlaps with so many other activities. When does a violent protest become
terrorism? When does some sort of psychotic episode where someone is acting out
become terrorism? It's a very hazy border."In Canada, section 83.01 of
the Criminal Code defines terrorism as an act committed "in whole or in
part for a political, religious or ideological purpose, objective or
cause" with the intention of intimidating the public's security or
compelling a person, government or organization to do or refrain from doing an
act. Thompson said this definition was intentionally general and open to
interpretation, but the key element is a political or ideological motivation."Terrorists can
attack literally anything and they have, but the motivation has to be more
political than anything else. Terrorism has always got an ideology involved in
it," he said.Two suspects have been charged with conspiracy
to commit murder. Had they been accused of terrorism, the range of offences and
potential punishment would have been much greater, said Thompson."Some of our terrorism legislation is
high-powered and we don't want it to be used for every single case," he
said.Andrew Mack, a security expert
and professor in the school for international studies at Simon Fraser
University, called the alleged Halifax plot a "deadly criminal
offence," but not a terrorist one."The
important point there is political intent, and 'political' is fairly widely
interpreted," he said. "If we're talking about (ISIL), for example,
they will always justify what they're doing in religious terms. But as far as
law enforcement is concerned, that's political."There has been considerable debate over whether terrorism should be
defined separately from other acts of mass violence, said Christian Leuprecht,
a security expert with Queens University and the Royal Military College of
Canada."This
is an issue that was raised after 9-11 and this is an issue that continues to
preoccupy us," he said. "Is there a point in actually having
terrorism as an offence at all?"However, Leuprecht said he believes the legal distinction is important.He said Canada's anti-terror legislation affords police more powers in
preventing planned attacks, but investigations tend to be longer and more
laborious. The government also must be able to identify and define terrorist
organizations, he said."If we simply rely on Criminal Code provisions then we can't lay
out those clear distinctions," he said.Leuprecht added there
are "mountains of case law" for prosecutors to rely on when it comes
to seeking a conviction for conspiracy to commit murder. But terrorism-related
offences are a relatively new area of law and only a small number of people
have been convicted.He said
the target of the attack is important, pointing out a plot to attack the Nova
Scotia legislature would have likely been considered terrorist."These are distinct threats to the broader national security of
Canada," he said. "Plotting to commit an attack on a mall in Halifax,
while atrocious, is not an inherent risk to the security of Canada."The suspects
charged in connection with the Halifax case, Lindsay Kantha Souvannarath, 23,
and Randall Steven Shepherd, 20, are to appear in court on Tuesday to face the
allegations against them. A third
suspect, a 19-year-old teen, was found dead by police in a Halifax area home
while a fourth person, a 17-year-old, was arrested but later released without
being charged.
"Toronto Sick Children's, Sunnybrook
and St.Josephhospitals"are the samehellsofAbu-Ghraib and
Guantanamo! 100% of evidence.
“Also Fear and Torture in Canadian
Hospitals”Hospitals of this city
should be investigated by an international human rights organization, not only
by the infringement on personal medical records, also by the eminent danger
which doctors represent for the patients. Health centers: as St Joseph, and
Sunnybrook hospitals, has been used by the police in cooperation with medical
staff as places of physical and mental torture.
"Father
testified at child case of seeing the horror of the physical and psychological
deterioration of his son in the Sick Children's Hospital of Toronto"HospitalforSick Children
inTorontois one of thehealth centers,where so-calledmedical equipment togetherwith medical
studentsare usingchildrenas guinea pigsfor experiments. Thework of psychologistsis to manipulate, control, and dominatethe minds ofinfants until theyexhibittotal submission, prerequisite forthese criminalsto benefitfinancially.After causingsevere damageindeteriorating the mentaland physical health of children, their industrial businessis continuingto hospitalize ...
Toronto Mayor Rob Ford speaks to
supporters in Toronto on Monday, October 27, 2014.
THE CANADIAN PRESS/Darren Calabrese
TORONTO – A report in the Toronto Starsays
former mayor Rob Ford’s medical records have been breached four times in at
least three Toronto hospitals since he was diagnosed with cancer last
September.The newspaper indicates Ford’s health information was first accessed at
Humber River Regional Hospital in September, following by Mt. Sinai Hospital
and then by staff at the University Health Network (UHN).The Star confirms Ford’s medical file
was breached by staff at the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre just last week.A recent Star investigation
found many health-related breaches go unreported to the privacy office
highlighting the need to upgrade Ontario’s health privacy laws.Ford was diagnosed with a rare form of abdominal cancer in mid-September
and dropped his bid for mayoral re-election shortly afterwards.Instead, he ran for a seat on city council and
was voted in during the Oct. 27 municipal election.
!
Canadian Al Qaeda’s:Network of Terror?
"Sunnybrook
and St.Josephhospitals"are the samehellsofAbu-Ghraib and
Guantanamo!Crimes are beingperpetratedintheSunnybrookandSt.Josephhospitals
by doctors and the health care workers, these actions of horrors has created a debacle
in regard to human rights violations.The
metro Toronto police with the help of physicians and others health hospital workers
have been using these infernos of abuse and torture to subject to the patients and
social activists to the unimaginable and indescribable acts of brutality and
torture committed in this nation.Overwhelming
evidence confirm that the lives of the patients in the Sunnybrook and St Joseph
hospitals are in constant risk, because the doctors are not following their Hippocratic
Oath swear to uphold the specific ethical standards.These illegal methods of torture which are inflicted intentionally in patients
to cause severe physical pain and mental suffering can be compared with the horrifying
tortures carry out at the infamous prisons of Abu-Ghraib and Guantanamo. Ifyoudonot givecrediton
the abuse, torture, and theintentionofmurderingapatient/s in the Sunnybrookor St Joseph hospitals! Please feel free to contact thearchivesdepartmentof the mentioned hospitals,orDr.HansKredercanprovide
with truthful information.
