Toronto Police brutality, viciousness, inhumaneness, among highest-rated city services: Jessica Smith Cross Metro news

Toronto Police Among the Highest - rated ...?
                                      

Toronto police among highest-rated city services: City Matters

By Jessica Smith Cross Metro

                                                                                                                                                         Saturday Dec 13, 201404:01 PM GMT

It’s causing outrage, revulsion, and grief, to know that the city of Toronto and provincial politicians are feeling that the repressive Toronto police force is among the highest rated city services. Jessica Smith and corrupted politicians are supporting that the White privilege in which Whiteness confers not only license to abuse children and women, also to dehumanize and kill defenseless citizens daily. Police officers are hired with exorbitant salaries and sworn to “Serve and protect,” but police misconduct are present in the streets, police stations, hospitals, public housing ghettos… police brutality, harassment, verbal abuse, beatings of people, and unjustified assassinations, can’t be tolerated anymore. The Toronto Police department must have rules to prohibiting their police enforcers to commit heinous crimes, the police procedures should be reinforce them vigorously to serve and protect the public with fairness. Until now the police racist behavior, the white privileges to commit atrocities are present in the police force; why should we live in fear? Where the victims; are children, women, seniors, disabled individuals, and people from the poor neighborhoods.

Jessica Smith Cross Metro: Why did Police shoot this Teenager Nine Times Inside of the Streetcar?   

Toronto police among highest-rated city services: City Matters

Before taking office Mayor John Tory announced that repairing the relationship between Toronto police and the public is among his top priorities. Canada is a country of heinous crimes of grief and mourning, a land of human misery without any hope. An ocean of human tragedy, that their fierce waves drag millions of shattered lives. Nadir Siguencia                                                                                                                       But how broken is it?  

                                                                                                                                                      A survey conducted for Metro by MQO Research, found that, on average, Torontonians rate their police service a seven out of 10, making it one of the highest-rated city services.                                                                                             In the survey, only garbage collection scored higher. Respondents are more satisfied with the police, than with recreation programs parks, and much more than with road maintenance and the TTC.                   Police spokesman Mark Pugash said he couldn’t speculate on reasons for the high support, but said the rates of crime and violent crime in Toronto are low — even if not everyone realizes it.                                                He’s correct. Statistics Canada ranks Toronto lower than every other major city in Canada on its Crime Severity Index.                                                                                                                                                             “Toronto is one of the safest cities in North America, and yet every survey I’ve ever seen says people think crime is worse than it is.”                                                                                                                                            In Metro’s survey, 46 per cent of respondents rated police an eight out of 10 or higher.                               However, six per cent of respondents scored the police a three or lower. That may seem low, but it still represents some 150,000 Torontonians.   

                           

POLICE BRUTALITY: Toronto Cops Tackle & Kill Mentally Disabled Man For Nothing

                                                                      "Watch on you tube"

               

CANADA'S HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSE IS EXPOSED! THE TRUTH IS REVEALED (by Valerie Guillaime)

THE TRIAL CONTINUES, BEFORE JUDGE J. RICHIE, TO DECEMBER 5, 2014, AT OLD CITY HALL COURT.

SHOCKING NEW REVELATIONS ARE MADE, BY THE CROWN'S MAIN WITNESS, (AND THE POLICE ALLEGED VICTIM IN THIS CASE), WHO UNDER OATH HAS IDENTIFIED HERSELF TO BE SOMEONE ELSE, OTHER THAN IN THE POLICE REPORT.

Judge J. Richie
A Toronto Judge who has been upbraided for his bias decisions.

The Prosecutor's two witnesses gave inconsistent testimonies. 

1. After taking the oath and when she was asked to give her name, the witness gave a name that was

different from the one in the police report of the alleged victim, regarding the alleged assault.  The court was now dealing with two witnesses.  The one in the police report and the one on the witness stand.

2.  When the defendant then pointed this out to the court, the Crown Attorney, John Flaherty also tried to pass it off as nothing.  Claiming that the witness who is of Chinese background tend to use a different version of her name for cultural reasons, so this should error should be overlooked by the court.  The defendant would not have it so and also asked the court for physical proof from the witness, in identifying herself legally, to the court.

3. The crown's main witness who has testified could also not provide any such identification, except for a so-called government issued health card.  Again the defendant also caught some anomalies with that piece of evidence, as with the name of the alleged victim in the police report.  Judge J. Richie was also leaning towards favoring the Crown Attorney John Flarherty's request to accept that document as legal proof of the witness identity, which also differs from the one of the alleged  victim in this case. In essence the Crown Attorney John Flaherty, was asking the court to do something illegal by accepting the health card as a valid piece of government issued document, for legal purposes, when it is not.

4. A health card is not a valid piece of document that is also used for identification purposes. In fact it is also illegal to accept a health, card from someone for that purpose.  And especially on its own, without any other corroborating documents, as proof of someone's legal identity. It is also forbidden under the law and it also seem as if in Judge J. Richie's courtroom, that piece of evidence, from that document, might also be accepted by the judge. So basically, Judge J. Richie, is also agreeing to disregarding the law, on the advice of the Crown Attorney, John Flaherty,

5. The other troubling fact about the case, is that Judge J. Richie also seem to want to overlook, the discrepancy in the trial, in regards to the different identities of the two witnesses.  The one in the police report, or disclosure and also the witness, who has taken the stand and also gave testimony under oath, regarding the same case. 

6. To give the witness the benefit of the doubt, the defendant, who also cross-examined the witness also asked that the witness provide a second piece of government issued identification, but the witness could not. Not even in either names. That is, the one in the police report, or the one that she gave on the witness stand. 

7.  The so-called government issued health card from the Prosecutor's witness also contained two sets of names. One that was printed at the top and the other the names that were written in ink at the bottom of the health card.  This also suggest that the health card was also not valid. A normal health cards does not show two different sets of names, on the front of the card.

8. The Prosecutor, John Flaherty also proceeded to a trial on the words of a single witness and with no other proof to back up its charge against the defendant, other than those words.  And whose identity has also never been established by the court. We have a police report that is also inconsistent with the testimony of the Prosecutor's main witness, and namely with the witness also identifying herself to the court, with a different name, and identity, from the one in the police report. 

9. Next came the Prosecutor's other witness, who is the police officer who also made the arrest and also was involved in the incident at the police station, in the "cell video", which was later given to the defendant and that was also the basis for the section 11B application violation, under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms,by the defendant. In fact there were two police officers involved, but the Crown Attorney John Flaherty, only considered one of the two officers, as a witness and who also testified under oath.  Because of his "lack of recollection" of the events, at the station, the police officer's partner, who the defendant also felt should have also been one of the Crown Attorney's witness at the trial, also made the request for that police officer to testify, but with the Crown Attorney, John Flaherty, vehemently refusing this request, to have that police officer testified.

10. The one officer's statement could also not be challenge, by the defendant, through the cross-examination of his partner, who was also a witness at the police station, regarding the "cell video", either, as the tactic of the Crown Attorney John Flaherty, was to not have the two officers testify under oath about the incident.

The question to be asked is whether or not Judge J. Richie can also properly deal with the legal issues before him and also without being bias? So far in this trial he has also given the Crown Attorney John Flaherty, every opportunity to get what he wanted, even when there are also serious concerns about those requests.

Will Judge J. Richie ignore the fact that the case is also built on the sole testimony of a witness, whose identity, has now been shown to be different from the one in the police report?. And based on the Prosecutor's own witness at the trial?. Will he also ignore the other discrepancies in the case, including the inconsistencies of the other witness, the police officer, during his testimony? Will he also accept an illegal document from the Prosecutor's main witness, as proof that she is who she claim to be, which is also different from the identity of the police alleged victim?.

“When the Canadian Justice System Fails”

Canada is a country of heinous crimes of grief and mourning, a land of human misery without any hope. An ocean of human tragedy that their fierce waves drag millions of shattered lives!

A definition of justice for the Canadian judiciary: Justice is a quality or virtue of proceeding or judging respecting the truth and put into practice the right that assist every person to have their rights respected, which will be recognized as rightful or consequences of their behavior: justice must preside the core laws of a nation. It’s the right time to bring a definitive account of Canada, most abhorrent crimes committed in the courtrooms by corrupt judges, who knows very well they are convicting innocent people, and maiming the lives of children and parents for the rest of their life’s. The fraudulent Canadian justice system with the help of police, crown attorneys, duty councilors, and particularly family lawyers, are running a criminal business with excellent returns in the courtrooms, as well outside of their judicial chambers. Also with the so called absolutions! “Welcome to Pardons Canada,” the government and the justice system are destroying overwhelming evidence, how the so called trials are presided inside of the courtrooms, where accused people are exposed to the unfairness of the complete judiciary system, because the lack to know the rule of the law. The continuously victimization of poor families and vulnerable people by the repressive forces, private corporations, and the Department of Justice, are bringing the most repulsive miscarriages of justice in this country.

The regime, butchers judges, and others "Workers from the Vicious Children Aids Societies," involved in these indiscriminate heinous crimes, they have to know: the open wounds caused in children, parents, and other victims of this system, will be open forever.